Skip to content

· Public charity

California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$4.4MCrime & Legal$657kHousing & Shelter$386kEducation$122kYouth Development$58kHealth$34kArts & Culture$26k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $251k
$21,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENFUSE ACTION COLLECTIVE$149,132
LUMINA ALLIANCE$101,952
HOUSING JUSTICE COLLECTIVE LLC$21,250
SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC$18,438
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$14,198
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERFACE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICE: $77k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS INC: $5k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER INC: $60k → 11%SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS: $59k → 11%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $234k → 12%WOMENS CENTER-YOUTH &: $73k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $38k → 13%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $55k → 14%NEW STAR FAMILY CENTER: $27k → 14%EMPOWER YOLO INC: $70k → 16%HUMBOLDT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $55k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $43k → 18%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $68k → 19%INTERFACE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICE: $24k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $72k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30k → 11%SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS: $41k → 11%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $185k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER-YOUTH & FAMILY: $24k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $30k → 13%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $42k → 14%NEW STAR FAMILY CENTER: $26k → 14%EMPOWER YOLO INC: $30k → 16%HUMBOLDT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $29k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $38k → 18%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $23k → 19%DEAFHOPE: $46k → 9%COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY: $75k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $21k → 10%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $138k → 12%BELOVED SURVIVORS: $32k → 19%COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY: $25k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $46k → 10%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $102k → 12%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $77k → 14%BELOVED SURVIVORS: $11k → 19%INTERVAL HOUSE: $45k → 10%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $19k → 14%RAINBOW SERVICES: $50k → 14%SHEPHERD'S DOOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $18k → 14%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING: $50k → 10%RAINBOW SERVICES: $50k → 14%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $20k → 10%HOUSE OF RUTH: $52k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 43 repeat orgs$473k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
14

Total granted

$5.2M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

91%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $157k · revenue +1%
  • SC
    SAC Connect
    3× · 2022–2024 · $138k · revenue +86%
  • CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $132k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • AC
    Alameda County Board of Supervisors
    one grant, 2024 · $96k
  • TB
    The Black Neighborhood
    one grant, 2024 · $58k · revenue 0% · 42% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
2
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
3
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
4
The Center for Violence-Free Relationships

The Center for Violence-Free Relationships is dedicated to building healthy relationships, families, and communities free from sexual assault and domestic violence through education, advocacy, and services in western El Dorado County.

—
5
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
6
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

—
9
Safe Voices

The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

—
10
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
11
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
12
Dove House Advocacy Services

With wrap-around services, dove house seeks to address the needs of victimes of domestic violence, sexual assaultm and general crime in jefferson county as they navigate the many systems required to move from being victims to surviving and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Glendale and Pasadena; the most unlike its peers is Sac Connect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
26/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUMINA ALLIANCE: $657,927 · Human ServicesLUMINA ALLIANCEHuman Options Inc: $104,643 · Human ServicesInterface Children Family Services: $100,696 · Human ServicesRAINBOW SERVICES: $100,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS: $100,000 · Human ServicesCOALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY: $100,000 · Human ServicesEmpower Yolo Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $99,574 · Human ServicesPREVAIL CA: $97,001 · Human ServicesThe Desert Sanctuary Inc: $96,880 · Human ServicesDOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $95,960 · Human ServicesLAURA'S HOUSE: $92,879 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $91,275 · Human ServicesWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $90,844 · Human ServicesINTERVAL HOUSE: $90,744 · Human Services+9 more: $543,100 · Human Services+9 moreENFUSE ACTION COLLECTIVE: $697,375 · OtherENFUSE ACTION COLLECTIVESAC Connect: $137,672 · OtherSAC ConnectHOUSING JUSTICE COLLECTIVE LLC: $134,000 · OtherHOUSING JUSTICE COLLECTIVE LLCSafeQuest Solano Inc: $105,259 · OtherWEAVE INC: $101,447 · OtherA SAFE PLACE: $100,000 · OtherCommunity Beyond Violence: $100,000 · OtherCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $99,694 · OtherAlameda County Board of Supervisors: $96,250 · OtherPEACE OVER VIOLENCE: $96,227 · OtherTOLOWA DEE-NI' NATION: $86,080 · OtherOPTION HOUSE: $82,726 · OtherLAO FAMILY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $73,721 · Other+5 more: $98,046 · OtherCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $132,236 · Crime & LegalPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER: $100,000 · Crime & LegalFamily Violence Law Center: $90,196 · Crime & LegalWAYMAKERS: $26,035 · Crime & LegalRiverside County Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence: $16,359 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $7,689 · Crime & LegalSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $157,376 · Housing & ShelterRUBY'S PLACE INC: $95,051 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $7,088 · Housing & ShelterAlliance for Community Transformations: $100,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute: $34,198 · HealthCORONA NORCO UNITED WAY: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL TRANSGENDER SAFETY TASK FORCE USA INC: $99,985 · Civil RightsThe Black Neighborhood: $57,922 · Youth Development
Human Services$2,561,523Other$2,108,497Crime & Legal$372,515Housing & Shelter$259,515Health$134,198Philanthropy$100,000Civil Rights$99,985Youth Development$57,922

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUMINA ALLIANCE: $657,927 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $157,376 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAC Connect: $137,672 over 3y, 13% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $132,236 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSafeQuest Solano Inc: $105,259 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $104,643 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWEAVE INC: $101,447 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetInterface Children Family Services: $100,696 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA SAFE PLACE: $100,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetRAINBOW SERVICES: $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity Beyond Violence: $100,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS: $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCOALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY: $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCORONA NORCO UNITED WAY: $100,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetAlliance for Community Transformations: $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $99,574 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPREVAIL CA: $97,001 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe Desert Sanctuary Inc: $96,880 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE: $96,227 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $95,960 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetRUBY'S PLACE INC: $95,051 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $92,879 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $91,275 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $90,844 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetINTERVAL HOUSE: $90,744 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Violence Law Center: $90,196 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHUMBOLDT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $83,646 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetOPTION HOUSE: $82,726 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $81,469 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $80,931 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLAO FAMILY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $73,721 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $69,897 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA: $67,868 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Black Neighborhood: $57,922 over 1y, 42% of budgetNEW STAR FAMILY CENTER: $53,156 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetDEAFHOPE: $46,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNeighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County: $44,897 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBeloved Survivors Trauma Recovery Center: $42,093 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $34,198 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAYMAKERS: $26,035 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $18,318 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHEPHERDS DOOR: $18,040 over 1y, 16% of budgetRiverside County Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence: $16,359 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEMPOWER TEHAMA: $7,689 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC: $7,088 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Women's Foundation of CaliforniaCA75× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Women's Foundation of California · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Valorus · Weingart Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Orange County Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The California Endowment

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Partnership to End Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Partnership to End Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Partnership to End Domestic Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph