Skip to content
Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 at a glance

· Private foundation

Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$783k
Granted FY2026still arriving
30
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.4MEducation$739kArts & Culture$618kEnvironment$530kHuman Services$466kHousing & Shelter$385kReligion$350kAnimals$300kOther$0
02FY2026 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k11 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $273k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $455k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC$200,000
NEVILLE PUBLIC MUSEUM$100,000
GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDENS$100,000
GREEN BAY COMMUNITY THEATER$55,000
FREEDOM HOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES$35,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST$25,000
HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC$25,000
MANDOLIN FOUNDATION$25,000
FOSTER THE VILLAGE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE RICHARD MAUTHE CENTER FOR FAITH$20,000
CEREBRAL PALSY INC$18,000
EINSTEIN PROJECTINC$15,000
LITERACY GREEN BAY INC$15,000
CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $271k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 17%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $20k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $5k → 10%LAUNDRY LOVE BROWN COUNTY: $5k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $50k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $50k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $50k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $5k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $1k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST: $50k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST: $25k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 39 repeat orgs$870k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2026, 20 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
24

Total granted

$5.1M
$725k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

64%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    8× · 2018–2026 · $441k · revenue +33%
  • TB
    THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $325k · revenue +483%
  • SV
    St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • EC
    ECUMENICAL CENTER AT THE
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • FV
    FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PALS YOUTH AND FAM INC
    one grant, 2025 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
2
New Community Shelter Foundation Inc

New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.

Housing & Shelter
3
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (innovative care services) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities…

Human Services
4
Family Service Agency of Waukesha County Inc

Building stronger communities, strengthening families, and empowering individuals through compassionate, life changing programs and behavioral health services.

Human Services
5
Co-Care Inc

Co-care, inc. built fort howard apartments in order to provide affordable housing for older adults wanting to live in the co-care neighborhood, the near west side of green bay.

Housing & Shelter
6
Green Haven Family Advocates Inc

Strengthen the individuals and families of green county, wisconsin affected by abuse and violence through prevention education, advocacy, support, and services.

Human Services
7
Glenhaven Inc

To provide therapeutic, preventative, and restorative care to our residents that will assist them to obtain and maintain an optimum level of health and well-being.

Health
8
Northwest Passage Ltd

None

Health
9
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…

Housing & Shelter
10
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
11
Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc

The mission of the greater green bay community foundation, inc. is to inspire and encourage charitable giving in northeast wisconsin by connecting caring people with solutions that strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
12
Downtown Green Bay Inc

Dgbi works to revitalize the social and economic climate of downtown green bay.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gateway Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Hill Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
32/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINNEVILLE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $400,000 · OtherNEVILLE PUBLIC MUSEUMTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 · OtherTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCFRIENDS OF THE BAY BEACH WILDLIFE: $300,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE BAY BEACH WILDLIFEIndividual grant recipient: $189,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING OF GREEN BAY: $185,000 · OtherECUMENICAL CENTER AT THE: $150,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC: $150,000 · OtherNATIONAL RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $142,000 · OtherFREEDOM HOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES: $125,000 · Other+34 more: $1,258,550 · Other+34 moreSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s: $250,000 · HealthSt Vincent Ho…JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC: $135,000 · HealthJACKIE NITSCH…CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $123,000 · HealthCEREBRAL PALS…EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $110,000 · HealthEXCEPTIONAL E…BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $33,500 · HealthMandolin Foundation Limited: $25,000 · Health+4 more: $55,000 · Health+4 moreGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $441,000 · EnvironmentGREEN BAY …BAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $88,500 · EnvironmentBAIRD CREE…GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $156,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF PALS YOUTH AND FAM INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesFoster the Village Inc: $25,000 · Human Services+3 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $250,000 · EmploymentWE ARE HOPE INC: $15,000 · EmploymentNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $210,000 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS 1ST OF NEW INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GATEWAY COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC: $101,000 · Arts & CultureGreen Bay Community Theater Inc: $55,000 · Arts & CultureMEYER THEATRE CORPORATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBROWN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,624,550Health$731,500Environment$529,500Human Services$366,000Employment$265,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Arts & Culture$231,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $441,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $250,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $210,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $156,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC: $150,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $142,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC: $135,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY INC: $123,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $110,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetTHE RICHARD MAUTHE CENTER FOR FAITH: $105,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC: $101,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $88,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC: $84,550 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGreen Bay Community Theater Inc: $55,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetMEYER THEATRE CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLITERACY GREEN BAY INC: $45,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $45,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $33,500 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPROVIDENCE MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCUP O JOY MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFoster the Village Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBROWN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE INC: $16,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWE ARE HOPE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBROWN COUNTY ORAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSERVICE LEAGUE OF GREEN BAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHOWARD SUAMICO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAILROAD MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE RICHARD MAUTHE CENTER FOR FAITH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC ↗
  • Who funds Green Bay Community Theater Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEYER THEATRE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PALS YOUTH AND FAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ON BROADWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay Com…Green Bay Packers Fou…George Kress Foundati…K C Stock Foundation …Wisconsin Public Serv…John and Engrid Meng …Schreiber Foods Found…De Pere Christian Out…Cornerstone Foundatio…US Ventureschmidt Fam…Weyers Family Foundat…Little Rapids Corpora…
Greater Green Bay Community Foundation IncWI75.5× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Weyers Family Foundation Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home