Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Boys Club of Wake County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, toreach their full potential as productive, caring, responsiblecitizens.

$109k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Youth Development$10M
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$108,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATION$108,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $83k → 9%SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $597k → 11%COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $53k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER GASTON: $84k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $70k → 12%SALV ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY: $57k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY: $88k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION: $106k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY INC: $65k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ALBEMARLE: $76k → 16%SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREENSBORO: $90k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $79k → 18%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL PLAIN: $326k → 20%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA: $107k → 20%BOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $80k → 9%SALV ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DURHAM COUNTY: $52k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER GASTON: $83k → 12%SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY: $53k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY: $78k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION: $90k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY INC: $62k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ALBEMARLE: $75k → 16%SALV ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREENSBORO: $59k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $71k → 18%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL PLAIN: $310k → 20%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA: $95k → 20%BOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $108k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $75k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER GASTON: $76k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY: $77k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION: $81k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY INC: $62k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $68k → 18%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL PLAIN: $291k → 20%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA: $83k → 20%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $72k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER GASTON: $68k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY: $62k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASH EDGECOMBE COUNTIES INC: $75k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY INC: $56k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $66k → 18%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL PLAIN: $153k → 20%BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $164k → 12%BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $164k → 12%BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $163k → 12%BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $162k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 25 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 24 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$10M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+156%

Still filing today

76%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $652k · revenue +23%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $387k · revenue +276%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $352k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club Cleveland Countygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +156%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EASTERN PIEDMONT
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ELIZABETH CITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $27k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Girls Club
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern Nc Foundation Inc
3
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of North Central Georgia

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Cumberland County

To provide mentoring programs for at risk youth with educational and recreational opportunities that they normally may not be able to experience.

Crime & Legal
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia Inc

To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
8
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

9
Boys & Girls Club of Baldwin and Jones Co Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

10
Boys & Girls Clubs of the San Gorgonio Pass

To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Education
11
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Clinch Valley

Provide youth ages 5-17 with character development, leadership skills, education, career guidance, training for healthy habits, and life skills development to help them reach their full potential as caring, productive, responsible citizens.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of N Cent Nc and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Brevard Transylvania County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $2,444,284 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL PLAIN — $1,079,601 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COASTAL PLAINBRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $652,178 · OtherBRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CABARRUS COUNTY INC — $462,704 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CABARRUS COUNTY INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION INC — $351,953 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER GAS — $310,593 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES — $229,781 · Other+7 more — $589,271 · Other+7 moreBOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATION — $508,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON COUNTY/HENDERSONVILLE INC — $412,677 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON COUNTY/HE…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA — $387,434 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINABOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER TRIAD Inc — $348,568 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER TRIAD In…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF N CENT NC — $334,585 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF N CENT NCBoys & Girls Club of the Piedmont Inc — $310,060 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Club of the Piedmont IncBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BREVARD TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY INC — $305,409 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BREVARD TRANSYLVANI…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SANDHILLS INC — $268,551 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SANDHILLS INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY — $244,565 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTYBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE INC — $238,084 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE INCBoys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc — $165,946 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EDEN INC — $152,101 · Youth Development+2 more — $198,142 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE CO INC — $283,714 · Philanthropy
Other$6,120,365Youth Development$3,874,122Philanthropy$283,714

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $652,178 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetBOYS' CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY FOUNDATION — $508,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON COUNTY/HENDERSONVILLE INC — $412,677 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA — $387,434 over 4y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION INC — $351,953 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER TRIAD Inc — $348,568 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF N CENT NC — $334,585 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER GAS — $310,593 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of the Piedmont Inc — $310,060 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BREVARD TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY INC — $305,409 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE CO INC — $283,714 over 4y, 11% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SANDHILLS INC — $268,551 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY — $244,565 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE INC — $238,084 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES — $229,781 over 4y, 12% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern North Carolina Inc — $201,590 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc — $165,946 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN — $153,371 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EDEN INC — $152,101 over 4y, 20% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LUMBERTON NC — $118,542 over 4y, 26% of budgetCHEROKEE YOUTH CENTER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $79,600 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club Cleveland County — $69,800 over 1y, 19% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA51.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Anonymous Trust U/A Dated 2-4-2008 · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Boys Club of Wake County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $500 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph