· Private foundation
Anonymous Trust U/A Dated 2-4-2008
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k193 grants · $472k
- $10k–50k78 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k51 grants · $5.6M
- $250k+22 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $2,520,570 |
| ARISE COLLECTIVE | $1,569,768 |
| NC STATE FOUNDATION INC | $1,325,950 |
| NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION | $1,002,640 |
| UNC PEMBROKE FOUNDATION INC | $604,384 |
| BARTON COLLEGE | $487,115 |
| FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $405,145 |
| IPAS | $400,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $400,000 |
| UNC CHAPEL HILL | $380,370 |
| RIPE FOR REVIVAL | $315,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY - NICHOLAS SCHOOL | $300,000 |
| ECU HEALTH FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| YMCA OF SOUTHEASTERN NC | $300,000 |
| NC BAPTIST MEN | $275,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
220 repeat relationships — 134 still active in FY2025, 86 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACARISE COLLECTIVE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $6.5M · revenue +69% · 76% of their budget
- NCNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2023 · $2.8M · revenue +364%
The Madeira School3× · 2020–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +226%
Funded once
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +25%- BRBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +57%
- CACLINTON AREA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $206k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.
Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…
The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…
William peace university is a private four-year university in downtown raleigh, north carolina. the mission of the university is to prepare students for careers in the organizations of tomorrow. rooted in the liberal arts tradition, the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbell University and the most unlike its peers is Simply Girls Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
184 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 184 of the 452 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARISE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Madeira School ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Southeastern North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SIMPLY GIRLS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IPAS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds RIPE FOR REVIVAL ↗
- Who funds BARTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ROANOKE ISLAND HISTORICAL ASSOCIATI ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TRIANGLE INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL FORUM OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Community Self-Help ↗
- Who funds HEALTH EDUCATION FDN OF EASTERN NC INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTS AND HANDS FOR HAITI ↗
- Who funds CAPE FEAR BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Camber Foundation · The Golden Leaf Inc · Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Robert P Holding Foundation Inc · Barnhill Family Foundation · Childtrust Foundation · The Harold H Bate Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anonymous Trust U/A Dated 2-4-2008 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Schools That Lead — 4% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Ave Maria University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anonymous Trust U/A Dated 2-4-2008?
Find your warmest path to Anonymous Trust U/A Dated 2-4-2008 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.