Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc

The cal ripken, sr.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Youth Development$5.4MCrime & Legal$2.6MHuman Services$778kRecreation & Sports$598kPhilanthropy$143kEducation$141kReligion$56kPublic Benefit$56kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 43 grants below total $663,927 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,192,142 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $528,215 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $157k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $373k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$10,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE$84,052
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HARFORD COUNTY MARYLAND INC$33,868
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND$26,883
HARLEM RBI INCORPORATED$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BERKSHIRES$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$24,484
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY$21,126
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY$20,998
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY$20,069
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE AUSTIN AREA$19,961
BOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC$18,000
THE POLICE ATHLETIC AND ACTIVITIES LEAGUE OF HARTFORD INCORPORATED$17,500
JAMES MOSHER ASSOCIATES INC$16,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA$15,483
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAZELTON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $13k → 15%LOISAIDA INC: $5k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE FOX VALLEY: $7k → 7%YOUTH GO: $16k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $7k → 17%THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE INC: $7k → 8%HAZELTON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $6k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE FOX VALLEY: $5k → 7%YOUTH GO: $6k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 17%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $3k → 8%YOUTH GO: $5k → 11%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $2k → 8%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE INC: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $7k → 17%SAFE ALTERNATIVE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC: $13k → 19%SAFE: $5k → 19%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER - SPRINGFIELD MA: $7k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 17%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE- NC: $6k → 8%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $10k → 19%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $10k → 19%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $17k → 19%CENTRAL MARYLAND Y - WEINBERG: $27k → 19%CENTRAL MARYLAND Y - WEINBERG: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.3M · 100 repeat orgs$492k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

100 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
42

Total granted

$9.3M
$415k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+45%

Still filing today

77%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $573k · revenue +93%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARFORD AND CECIL COUNTIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $376k · revenue +92%
  • NO
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $361k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue +45%
  • NL
    NANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -5%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $31k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
2
Boys Girls Club
—
3
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of the San Gorgonio Pass

To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Education
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Billerica Inc

To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County

Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.

Recreation & Sports
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Clubs of Cascade County

Enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Capital Area

To provide a safe, fun place where youth are inspired to make healthy, responsible choices.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Club of Bloomfield

The corporation provides youth with after school activities to promote education, sports and recreation.

—
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Clinch Valley

Provide youth ages 5-17 with character development, leadership skills, education, career guidance, training for healthy habits, and life skills development to help them reach their full potential as caring, productive, responsible citizens.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Richmond Police Athletic League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesYmca Youth Development
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/150
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,415

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/118
Grantees still filing
83/118
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FEDERAL OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION — $2,168,706 · OtherFEDERAL OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVEN…JOURNEY HOUSE — $463,062 · OtherJOURNEY HOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARFORD AND CECIL COUNTIES INC — $375,797 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARFORD AND CECIL COUNTIES INCNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES — $360,717 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES+65 more — $1,611,435 · Other+65 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $572,753 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTYTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE — $297,745 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BAL…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY — $257,932 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEYBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $239,342 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALLBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA — $186,449 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR — $183,677 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY — $154,362 · Youth Development+46 more — $1,910,514 · Youth Development+46 moreSpringSpirit Inc — $145,329 · Recreation & SportsSoCal RBI League — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsINDIANAPOLIS URBAN YOUTH BASEBALL & SOFTBALL INC — $29,519 · Recreation & SportsJ Babe Stearn Community Center — $22,116 · Recreation & SportsPOUGHKEEPSIE MID HUDSON BABE RUTH — $17,500 · Recreation & SportsWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC — $17,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHARLEM RBI INC — $237,978 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $27,442 · Philanthropy+2 more — $13,000 · PhilanthropyYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — $79,434 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $46,499 · Human ServicesYOUTH GO INC — $27,338 · Human ServicesSAFE ALTERNATIVE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC — $18,403 · Human ServicesHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC — $18,194 · Human ServicesTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE — $17,631 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $11,868 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $9,992 · Human Services+2 more — $11,829 · Human ServicesLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $67,340 · EducationNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES — $50,000 · EducationWICOMICO COUNTY FREE LIBRARY — $8,776 · EducationKNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $29,748 · Religion
Other$4,979,717Youth Development$3,802,774Recreation & Sports$291,964Philanthropy$278,420Human Services$253,188Education$126,116Religion$29,748

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $572,753 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARFORD AND CECIL COUNTIES INC — $375,797 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES — $360,717 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE — $297,745 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY — $257,932 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $239,342 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHARLEM RBI INC — $237,978 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA — $186,449 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR — $183,677 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY — $154,362 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSpringSpirit Inc — $145,329 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetWAKEMAN MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION INC — $120,736 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC — $120,635 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $120,541 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC — $117,068 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND — $116,330 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA INC — $104,261 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $96,740 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE — $93,401 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetThe Police Activities League of Hartford Incorporated — $92,281 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetJames Mosher Associates Inc — $91,249 over 8y, 88% of budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS — $89,579 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INC — $85,641 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — $79,434 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF THE BERKSHIRES INC — $75,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $67,340 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC — $64,559 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc — $62,129 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC — $61,663 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CECIL COUNTY INC — $54,986 over 2y, 18% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $52,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES — $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN — $47,196 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $46,499 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC — $46,365 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCherry Hill Eagles Foundation Inc — $44,989 over 3y, 12% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE INC — $44,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ANNAPOLIS & ANNE ARUNDEL — $44,327 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWATERVILLE AREA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $41,190 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSoCal RBI League — $40,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $37,154 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $34,787 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO — $33,765 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA — $33,029 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc — $31,480 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $31,470 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $29,821 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC — $29,809 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARFORD AND CECIL COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM RBI INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SpringSpirit Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAKEMAN MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
  • Who funds The Police Activities League of Hartford Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds James Mosher Associates Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CECIL COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of…Boys & Girls Clubs of…Rite Aid Healthy Futu…Dick's Sporting Goods…The Gap FoundationGood Sports IncInspire Brands Founda…Boys Club of Wake Cou…Carmax FoundationDollar General Litera…The Boys and Girls Cl…National Recreation a…
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA106.5× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Good Sports Inc · Inspire Brands Foundation Inc · Boys Club of Wake County Inc · Carmax Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore · National Recreation and Park Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • The Police Activities League of Hartford Incorporated — 70% of income from government
  • It Takes a Village to Help Our Children Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club Family Center Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore — 2% of income from government
  • Springfield Boys & Girls Club Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
60report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines