· Public charity
Big League Impact Inc
To help provide support and basic essential resources to people and communities around the world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $921,073 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $967,019 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,946 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $243k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $597k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALS Association - National | $205,050 |
| Team Red White & Blue | $144,050 |
| Water Mission | $80,150 |
| The Little Bit Foundation | $66,621 |
| San Diego Rescue Mission | $50,700 |
| Crisis Aid | $50,315 |
| Ronald McDonald House | $27,752 |
| Graces Place | $27,671 |
| St Louis Public School Fnd | $20,121 |
| City of Refuge Baltimore | $19,326 |
| Trace Bittle Scholarship Fund | $16,704 |
| Wildcat Foodpack Organization | $15,718 |
| School District of Washington | $15,718 |
| Tenkiller Elementary School | $14,673 |
| Backstoppers Foundation | $14,091 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $527k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICINTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC8× · 2017–2024 · $546k · revenue +20%
- FFFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC5× · 2017–2021 · $455k · revenue +41%
- OFOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC6× · 2017–2023 · $251k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- ADARCHCITY DEFENDERSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +58%
- S3STRIKE 3 FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -19%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $59k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.
Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…
Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rogers Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC ↗
- Who funds HELP ONE NOW ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONSIDER THE LILY INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds ARCHCITY DEFENDERS ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds STRIKE 3 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds ONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds GRACE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds ITAWAMBA CROSSROADS RANCH ↗
- Who funds Brace for Impact 46 Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hearing the Call Inc ↗
- Who funds Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Players Trust · Major League Baseball Charities Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Teammates for Kids Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · St Louis Cardinals Community Fund · Franklin County Area United Way Inc · Stifel Foundation Inc · Trio Foundation of St Louis
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Big League Impact Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Franklin Square Hospital Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Big League Impact Inc?
Find your warmest path to Big League Impact Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.