· Public charity
Teammates for Kids Foundation
In partnership with professional athletes, corporations, foundations, celebrities and individual teammates, we help children in the areas of health, education and inner city.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $363k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $661,506 |
| Individual grant recipient | $384,407 |
| PASTIME YOUTH ACADEMIES | $251,000 |
| VERTICAL LLC | $104,223 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $73,845 |
| JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION -CHILD LIFE DEPT | $30,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND | $25,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $22,154 |
| A ONE STOP PRINT SHOP | $13,187 |
| PROHOLDINGS | $11,509 |
| TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - CHILD LIFE DEPT | $8,629 |
| SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $7,980 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 32 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $738k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PWPASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +2% · 98% of their budget
- CCCook Children's Medical Center8× · 2017–2024 · $469k · revenue +118%
- CCCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $409k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- MLMajor League Baseball Charities Incone grant, 2019 · $890k · revenue -10%
- KCKANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INCone grant, 2018 · $300k
- SLST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUNDone grant, 2020 · $123k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The giants community fund (the "fund") uses baseball and softball to promote health, education, and character development to propel youth in underserved regions to be positive forces in their communities. the fund, a 501(c)(3) public…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
The major league baseball players trust harnesses the expertise, influence, and energy of players to create meaningful and sustainable change in the lifelong well-being of others. this is achieved through a series of programs that are run…
We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…
See schedule ochildren's hospital foundation dba children's national hospital foundation supports world class care and research for the nation's children. children's national hospital foundation serves as the fundraising arm for children's…
To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.
Through the investment of time, talents, and treasure, the charlotte hornets foundation will support, promote, and enhance important community efforts that enrich the quality of life for those in need, especially children and youth…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Astros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Major League Baseball Charities Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN ↗
- Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds Hope for Haiti Childrens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PREDATORS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERS ↗
- Who funds Colorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Health Inc ↗
- Who funds Radical Inc ↗
- Who funds THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONUMENTAL SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE IS GOOD PLAYMAKER PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Charities Inc · Fantasy Camps for Kids · Major League Baseball Players Trust · Jackson Yelle Family Foundation · Pitch in for Baseball and Softball · Big League Impact Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Texas Rangers Baseball Foundation · Nfl Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teammates for Kids Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc — 33% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Teammates for Kids Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Teammates for Kids Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.