How much did TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION grant in FY2023?

Health$3.1MPhilanthropy$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.6MEducation$1.1MInternational$519kYouth Development$174kHuman Services$142kReligion$104kPublic Benefit$100kOther$5.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

christian ministryministry athletesathletes coachesinspireskillsgamesoccer

2019

internationaltechnology cartchurchmaximum potentialdolphinadultsunique

2020

foodmillionyouth baseballcasasafeprogrammingnationals

2021

cancerucladesignexhibitchild zoneemotional

2022

joe dimaggiodimaggio children'suclanationpatientssportsdedicated

2023

child zonesjoe dimaggiodimaggio children'sbetterucladedicatedchild zone

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k4 grants · $28k
$10k–50k5 grants · $102k
$50k–250k5 grants · $363k
$250k+3 grants · $1.3M

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$93M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$661,506
CHICAGO SCENIC STUDIOS$384,407
PASTIME YOUTH ACADEMIES$251,000
VERTICAL LLC$104,223
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$80,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$73,845
JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$55,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$50,000
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION -CHILD LIFE DEPT$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND$25,000
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$22,154
A ONE STOP PRINT SHOP$13,187
PROHOLDINGS$11,509
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - CHILD LIFE DEPT$8,629
SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$7,980

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 44 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 33 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+55%

Still filing today

73%

81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $738k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PY
PASTTIME YOUTH ACADEMICS
7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +2% · 98% of their budget
UM
UCLA MATTEL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
5× · 2017–2023 · $966k · revenue +31%
CC
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATON-CHILD LIFE DEPT
8× · 2017–2024 · $469k · revenue +104%

Funded once

ML
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL CHARITIES INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $890k · revenue +44%
KC
KANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INC
one grant, 2018 · $300k
CC
CARDINALS CARE
one grant, 2020 · $123k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation

Recreation & Sports

The Children's Mercy Hospital Foundation

To provide support for the activities and mission of The Children's Mercy Hospital.

Health

Houston Texans Foundation

The houston texans foundation is committed to be champions for youth by enhancing their quality of life. the foundation supports and administers programs in education, character development and health and fitness to empower our next…

Youth Development

Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health

Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health

Seattle Seahawks Charitable Foundation

Promote the healthy social, emotional, intellectual, and physical development of youth by enhancing opportunities for participation in sports and fitness activities.

Philanthropy

Dallas Mavericks Foundation

Philanthropy

Miami Children's Health System Foundation Inc

The mission of MIAMI CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, INC. (D/B/A NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, INC.) is to create awareness and generate funds for Nicklaus Children's Health System (System), Nicklaus Children's…

—

Akron Children's Hospital Foundation

Akron children's hospital foundation is organized exclusively for the benefit of children's hospital medical center of akron. its purpose is to solicit gifts from donors.

Health

Dayton Children's Hospital Foundation

Dayton children's hospital foundation (the foundation) exists solely to benefit dayton children's hospital (dch), and to assist dch in performing its charitable mission.

Health

Chicago Bulls Charities

To make a positive impact on the lives of Chicagoans in need.

Philanthropy

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/111

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,454

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

99 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

95/99

Grantees still filing

75/99

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,558,161Health$3,142,935Philanthropy$1,978,206Recreation & Sports$1,562,546Education$1,133,494International$518,734Youth Development$174,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Major League Baseball Charities IncNY52.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Charities Inc · Fantasy Camps for Kids · Major League Baseball Players Trust · Pitch in for Baseball and Softball · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Big League Impact Inc · Nfl Foundation Inc · MLB-MLBPA Youth Development Foundation · Texas Rangers Baseball Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

9get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PASTTIME YOUTH ACADEMICS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 721603674 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PASTTIME YOUTH ACADEMICS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 98% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Teammates for Kids Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teammates for Kids Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

99 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teammates for Kids Foundation?

More from the funding graph

TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

99 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teammates for Kids Foundation?

More from the funding graph