Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bedrossian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$384kHuman Services$239kEducation$159kFood & Nutrition$159kHousing & Shelter$159kPhilanthropy$80kReligion$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$13,806
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES$13,806
THE CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE$13,806
THE SALVATION ARMY - VANCOUVER CORPS$13,806
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER$13,806
NW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND$13,806
FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$13,806
RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS$13,806
FISH OF VANCOUVER$13,806
Individual grant recipient$13,806
SHARE INC$13,806
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY-KATZ SCHOOL OF$13,806
YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY$13,806
IMPACT NW$13,806
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$13,806
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE$13,806
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $239k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $16k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $14k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $14k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $13k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $12k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $12k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $16k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $14k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $14k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $13k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $12k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $12k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $16k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $14k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $14k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $13k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $12k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$1.2M
$0

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YWCA CLARK COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +78%
  • FO
    FISH OF VANCOUVER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +332%
  • MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +10%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Community Health Center of Snohomish County

    Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

    Health
    2
    Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

    Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

    Health
    3
    Shared Care Services

    It is the mission of the evangelical homes of michigan, a health and human service ministry related to the united church of christ, to provide health and housing services to persons who are elderly in a manner which respects their rights,…

    Health
    4
    Willamette View Inc

    Provides residential and nursing care, wellness and therapy services through the operation of continuing care retirement community; and provides in-home care services to residents and individuals in the greater community.

    Human Services
    5
    Sheltercare

    Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

    Housing & Shelter
    6
    The Wallace Medical Concern

    We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

    —
    7
    Community Care of West Virginia Inc

    The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

    —
    8
    Columbia Valley Community Health

    The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

    Health
    9
    Columbia River Mental Health Services

    Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

    Health
    10
    Willamette Vital Health

    We provide comprehensive hospice care services, supportive care for pain & symptom management for those with serious illness, and grief support. through our mission, willamette vital health supports adults and children living with a…

    Human Services
    11
    Community Health Care Inc

    Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

    —
    12
    Portland Street Medicine

    We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Impact Nw; the most unlike its peers is Cdm in-Home Care Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $95,107 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYNW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND: $79,557 · OtherNW ASSOCIATION FOR BLINDTEMPLE UNIVERSITY-KATZ SCHOOL OF: $79,557 · OtherTEMPLE UNIVERSITY-KATZ SCHOOL OFFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $79,557 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHROTARY FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER: $79,557 · OtherROTARY FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVERSHARE: $79,557 · OtherSHARECHILDREN'S CENTER: $79,557 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTERRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS: $79,557 · OtherRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESSIndividual grant recipient: $51,599 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY - VANCOUVER CORPS: $40,056 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $39,501 · OtherYWCA CLARK COUNTY: $79,557 · Human ServicesYWCA CLARK COUNTYFISH OF VANCOUVER: $79,557 · Human ServicesFISH OF VANCOUVERCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES: $79,557 · Human ServicesCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICESIMPACT NW: $79,557 · Human ServicesIMPACT NWCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $79,557 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $79,557 · Food & NutritionFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $50,307 · Health
    Other$783,162Human Services$318,228Education$79,557Food & Nutrition$79,557Health$50,307

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA CLARK COUNTY: $79,557 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER: $79,557 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $79,557 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES: $79,557 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $79,557 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE: $79,557 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER: $79,557 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetIMPACT NW: $79,557 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $50,307 over 4y, 1.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YWCA CLARK COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds FISH OF VANCOUVER ↗
    • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds CDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
    • Who funds SHARE ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
    • Who funds IMPACT NW ↗
    • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Firstenburg FoundationWA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · The Swigert Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Beaches Summertime Cruisin' · Columbia Community Credit Union · Southwest Washington Regional Health Alliance · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Bedrossian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bedrossian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
    • Impact Nw: 8% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bedrossian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph