Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bedrossian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$384kHuman Services$239kEducation$159kFood & Nutrition$159kHousing & Shelter$159kPhilanthropy$80kReligion$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$13,806
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE$13,806
IMPACT NW$13,806
THE CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE$13,806
THE SALVATION ARMY - VANCOUVER CORPS$13,806
NW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND$13,806
RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS$13,806
Individual grant recipient$13,806
YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY$13,806
FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$13,806
FISH OF VANCOUVER$13,806
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY-KATZ SCHOOL OF$13,806
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$13,806
CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES$13,806
OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY$13,806
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER$13,806
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $239k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $16k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $14k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $14k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $13k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $12k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $12k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $16k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $14k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $14k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $13k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $12k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $12k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $16k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $14k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $14k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $13k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $12k → 9%CDM CAREGIVING SERVICES: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$1.2M
$0

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YWCA CLARK COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +78%
  • FO
    FISH OF VANCOUVER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +332%
  • MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +10%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Community Health Center of Snohomish County

    Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

    Health
    2
    Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

    Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

    Health
    3
    Shared Care Services

    It is the mission of the evangelical homes of michigan, a health and human service ministry related to the united church of christ, to provide health and housing services to persons who are elderly in a manner which respects their rights,…

    Health
    4
    Willamette View Inc

    Provides residential and nursing care, wellness and therapy services through the operation of continuing care retirement community; and provides in-home care services to residents and individuals in the greater community.

    Human Services
    5
    Sheltercare

    Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

    Housing & Shelter
    6
    The Wallace Medical Concern

    We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

    7
    Community Care of West Virginia Inc

    The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

    8
    Columbia Valley Community Health

    The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

    Health
    9
    Columbia River Mental Health Services

    Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

    Health
    10
    Willamette Vital Health

    We provide comprehensive hospice care services, supportive care for pain & symptom management for those with serious illness, and grief support. through our mission, willamette vital health supports adults and children living with a…

    Human Services
    11
    Community Health Care Inc

    Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

    12
    Portland Street Medicine

    We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Impact Nw and the most unlike its peers is Cdm in-Home Care Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY — $95,107 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $79,557 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHILDREN'S CENTER — $79,557 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTERNW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND — $79,557 · OtherNW ASSOCIATION FOR BLINDROTARY FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER — $79,557 · OtherROTARY FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVERRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS — $79,557 · OtherRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESSTEMPLE UNIVERSITY-KATZ SCHOOL OF — $79,557 · OtherTEMPLE UNIVERSITY-KATZ SCHOOL OFSHARE — $79,557 · OtherSHAREIndividual grant recipient — $51,599 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY - VANCOUVER CORPS — $40,056 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $39,501 · OtherYWCA CLARK COUNTY — $79,557 · Human ServicesYWCA CLARK COUNTYFISH OF VANCOUVER — $79,557 · Human ServicesFISH OF VANCOUVERCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES — $79,557 · Human ServicesCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICESIMPACT NW — $79,557 · Human ServicesIMPACT NWCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $79,557 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $79,557 · Food & NutritionFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON — $50,307 · Health
    Other$783,162Human Services$318,228Education$79,557Food & Nutrition$79,557Health$50,307

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYWCA CLARK COUNTY — $79,557 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER — $79,557 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER — $79,557 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $79,557 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES — $79,557 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $79,557 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT NW — $79,557 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE — $79,557 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON — $50,307 over 4y, 1.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YWCA CLARK COUNTY
    • Who funds FISH OF VANCOUVER
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER
    • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE
    • Who funds CDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES
    • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    • Who funds IMPACT NW
    • Who funds SHARE
    • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Firstenburg FoundationWA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · The Swigert Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Beaches Summertime Cruisin' · Columbia Community Credit Union · Southwest Washington Regional Health Alliance · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Bedrossian Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
    • Impact Nw8% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph