· Public charity
Columbia Community Credit Union
Bringing people together to make life better for themselves and their communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $192,525 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $286,208 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $93,683 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $171k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SW WASHINGTON | $25,000 |
| SHARE | $17,500 |
| CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK | $15,350 |
| COLUMBIA SPRINGS ENVIRONMENTAL | $15,000 |
| CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| STRIVE NORTHWEST | $15,000 |
| FORT VANC REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| GREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $11,650 |
| BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | $11,025 |
| SALMON CREEK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES | $10,000 |
| VANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| THE HISTORIC TRUST | $9,000 |
| ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS | $7,000 |
| CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON9× · 2017–2025 · $196k · revenue +83%- CCCLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · $120k · revenue +143%
- SNSTRIVE NORTHWEST8× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- IAINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBSone grant, 2019 · $15k
- WFWORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INCone grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -46%
FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +132%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.
Committed to fostering relationships between members and the community. to serve the interest of members by acting as a catalyst for a vibrant sustainable economy.
Foster Growth in the Community
The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.
The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…
The council is organized to foster partnerships for clean water, healthy streams, and abundant fisheries in the Clackamas Watershed
Through community partnerships and the effort of volunteers, we promote bicycle access, education, safety and the enjoyment of cycling to the children and adults of SW Washington. In simple terms, that translates to getting more people out…
Local care by and for our community.
To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…
The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…
To promote, support and advocate for the chamber's members, strengthen the economic climate of the coeur d'alene area, and further the free enterprise system.
Highline Medical Center Foundation brings our community together to support exceptional health care, close to home, for all who need it. Thanks to the generosity of our caring neighbors and friends, we help ensure that St Anne Hospital has…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Sw Washington and the most unlike its peers is Ridgefield Public Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds VANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC RESERVE TRUST ↗
- Who funds CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRIVE NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SHARE ↗
- Who funds FORT VANCOUVER REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for SW Washington ↗
- Who funds SALMON CREEK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA RIVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Building Industry Association of Clark County ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds GREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds VANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IDENTITY CLARK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Evergreen School District Foundation 114 ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MILITARY APPRECIATION COMMITTEE - CMAC ↗
- Who funds RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds VANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds HOME WITH HEROES ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD MAIN STREET ↗
- Who funds PEACEHEALTH SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST GROWTH CHILDREN & FAMILY CHARITIES DBA CLASSIC WINES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP CLARK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YWCA CLARK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Bridgeview Housing ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS ↗
- Who funds WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · The Honorable Frank L & Arlene G Price Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Anna C Macaskill Schwab and Dwight L Schwab · The Oregon Community Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Southwest Washington Regional Health Alliance · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Beaches Summertime Cruisin' · PeaceHealth · Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Columbia Community Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Young Men's Christian Association of Columbia-Willamette — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.