· Private foundation
B W Bastian Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k88 grants · $306k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $472k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $187k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Utah Pride Center | $75,120 |
| Encircle | $62,000 |
| Eisenhower Health Foundation | $50,000 |
| Equality Utah Foundation | $48,000 |
| UAF Legacy Health | $40,000 |
| Ballet West | $35,000 |
| Media Matters for America | $30,000 |
| Westminister College | $30,000 |
| American Red Cross | $25,000 |
| Human Rights Campaign Foundation | $21,200 |
| Victory Fund Institute | $20,000 |
| ACLU of Utah | $20,000 |
| Lambda Legal Western Regional Offic | $20,000 |
| Youth Futures | $20,000 |
| Flourish Therapy | $15,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $878k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
99 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UPUtah Pride Center Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $556k · revenue +204%
- BWBALLET WEST5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +88%
- EFEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center5× · 2020–2024 · $158k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Utah College of Educaone grant, 2021 · $15k
- SLSalt Lake Education Foundationone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +14%
POINT SOURCE YOUTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +186%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization pursues educational, lobbying, and poltical activities in order to further lesbain, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgbt) interests within utah.
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
Support various performing arts in utah.
Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
Our mission at uls is to provide high-quality civil legal aid without cost to people who are unable to afford legal representation or are facing disadvantages, ensuring meaningful access to justice, and promoting education, stability,…
Utah Dispute Resolution exists to provide residents of Utah with quality mediation services, information and training in dispute resolution, and the means to successfully, informally and cooperatively resolve disputes.
Utah Leads set out to understand what makes our information ecosystem in Utah unique, who is influencing policy formation in Utah, how that influence works in practice through multiple channels and across channels, and what policy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Rainbow Utah and the most unlike its peers is Lift and Love Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 204 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Utah Pride Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds Utah Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds Flourish Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE ACTING COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE TYLER CLEMENTI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FUTURES ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RAINBOW UTAH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN UTAH COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER MT ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DOCUMENTARY EXPRESSION AND ART ↗
- Who funds STAND4KIND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Miner Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization B W Bastian Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.