Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aria Foundation Co Tg Tax & Accounting Services LLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$186k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.

Environment$2.3MInternational$1.7MCommunity Improvement$879kHuman Services$810kYouth Development$524kCivil Rights$445kEducation$393kScience & Tech$315kHealth$215kOther$4.6M
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $982k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $991k
$20,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH$186,417
SF LGBT CENTER$168,505
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$83,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN$75,000
SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST$65,000
SAVING GRACE$65,000
SAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL$62,000
INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED TINKERING$62,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$60,000
FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK$55,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$55,000
GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND$54,500
MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY$45,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$42,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $745k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $30k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $20k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $20k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $20k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $15k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $10k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $70k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $70k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $60k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $55k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $55k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $50k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $50k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $45k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $40k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $40k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $40k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $40k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $10k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
SD
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 81 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
5

Total granted

$12M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+183%

Still filing today

86%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +91% · 29% of their budget
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $567k · revenue +26%
  • IF
    Institute for Applied Tinkering
    6× · 2020–2025 · $504k · revenue +340%

Funded once

  • BF
    BENDNEXT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • OC
    Oil Change International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +183%
  • TA
    THE ALICIA PATTERSON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Nedc's mission is to work toward a future in which the pacific northwest leads the nation in developing, implementing & enforcing strong laws and regulations that protect the environment & human health, and where our governments &…

—
2
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
350PDX

Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.

Environment
5
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
10
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is The Alicia Patterson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Local Food System Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History MuseumsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%45%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/84
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,481

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/82
Grantees still filing
55/82
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH — $1,627,903 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCHSAVING GRACE — $355,000 · OtherSAVING GRACERocky Mountain Institute — $230,000 · OtherRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC — $195,000 · OtherAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $240,000 · OtherWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $188,500 · Other+44 more — $2,690,343 · Other+44 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $567,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEF…GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $342,500 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FU…CENTRAL OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER INC DBA - THE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER — $253,767 · EnvironmentCENTRAL OREGON ENVIRO…PURE KNF FOUNDATION — $182,694 · EnvironmentPURE KNF FOUNDATIONOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — $155,418 · EnvironmentOregon Natural Resour…OREGON DESERT LAND TRUST — $140,000 · EnvironmentOREGON DESERT LAND TR…OCEANA INC — $125,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCUPPER DESCHUTES WATERSHED COUNCIL — $120,000 · Environment+13 more — $390,479 · Environment+13 morePCI-MEDIA IMPACT INC — $377,964 · InternationalPCI-MEDIA IMPAC…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $365,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS F…GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $360,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $240,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CO…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $150,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WA…INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES — $125,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR S…+2 more — $61,000 · InternationalSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $491,283 · Community ImprovementSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST — $343,000 · Community ImprovementWARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM — $30,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $15,000 · Community ImprovementFamily Access Network Foundation — $315,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY — $300,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACT — $115,000 · Human ServicesSTOVETEAM INTERNATIONAL — $65,000 · Human Services+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesInstitute for Applied Tinkering — $504,447 · Youth DevelopmentDESCHUTES COUNTY 4-H LEADERS ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $135,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $135,000 · Civil RightsNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $95,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC — $75,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$5,526,746Environment$2,276,858International$1,678,964Community Improvement$879,283Human Services$810,000Youth Development$524,447Civil Rights$445,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH — $1,627,903 over 6y, 29% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $567,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Applied Tinkering — $504,447 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $491,283 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetPCI-MEDIA IMPACT INC — $377,964 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $365,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $360,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST — $343,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $342,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFamily Access Network Foundation — $315,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY — $300,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER INC DBA - THE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER — $253,767 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $240,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $240,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $230,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC — $195,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $188,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPURE KNF FOUNDATION — $182,694 over 6y, 50% of budgetEarthworks — $170,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — $155,418 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION — $155,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSylvia Rivera Law Project Inc — $150,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetWaterWatch of Oregon — $150,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON DESERT LAND TRUST — $140,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $135,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM — $126,075 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOCEANA INC — $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES — $125,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUPPER DESCHUTES WATERSHED COUNCIL — $120,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT — $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance — $90,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTHE 1017 PROJECT — $90,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE — $85,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $65,979 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC — $65,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSTOVETEAM INTERNATIONAL — $65,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL — $62,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $55,788 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRESOURCE GENERATION INC — $54,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOregon 4-H Foundation — $50,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Applied Tinkering ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PCI-MEDIA IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds Family Access Network Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER INC DBA - THE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PURE KNF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Earthworks ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Sylvia Rivera Law Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds WaterWatch of Oregon ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON DESERT LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds UPPER DESCHUTES WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
  • Who funds OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds High Desert Food & Farm Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE 1017 PROJECT ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roundhouse Founda…The Oregon Community …Meyer Memorial TrustMaybelle Clark Macdon…The Collins FoundationThe Ford Family Found…The Anjulicia Foundat…First Interstate Banc…The Autzen FoundationRonald W Naito Md Fou…Bend FoundationJulio R Gallo Foundat…
The Roundhouse FoundationOR51.1× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roundhouse Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Collins Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Anjulicia Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Autzen Foundation · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · Bend Foundation · Julio R Gallo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aria Foundation Co Tg Tax & Accounting Services LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Institute for Sustainable Communities — 100% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
  • WaterWatch of Oregon — 61% of income from government
  • Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
  • Deschutes Land Trust — 46% of income from government
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance — 45% of income from government
  • Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
  • Upper Deschutes Watershed Council — 25% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
  • High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association — 9% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
  • Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides — 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Environmental Center Inc Dba - the Environmental Center — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines