· Private foundation
Ardmore Institute of Health
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM SUNBELT HEALTHCARE | $250,000 |
| UMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL | $200,000 |
| PATIENT-CENTERED PRIMARY CARE FOUNDATION | $156,237 |
| CHILDRENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $149,554 |
| ASPEN INSTITUTE | $130,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $126,000 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION | $125,130 |
| MEDSTAR HEALTH INC | $112,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL (DBA FHI 360) | $101,000 |
| THE TEACHING KITCHEN COLLABORATIVE INC | $100,000 |
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE | $100,000 |
| ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS | $80,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $77,149 |
| PAVING THE PATH TO WELLNESS | $75,988 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $923k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMERICAN COLLEGE OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE5× · 2020–2024 · $887k · revenue +103%
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CLINICINC2× · 2020–2021 · $486k · revenue +151%
- PPPATIENT-CENTERED PRIMARY CARE FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2024 · $481k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- USUC SAN DIEGO HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $268k
- RIRESTOREOKC INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +94%
- AKAdventHealth Kansas City Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $103k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
Endeavor Health Medical Group (EHMG) follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…
To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…
The mission of the University of Western States is to advance the science and art of integrated health care through excellence in education and patient care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Thomas N Lynn Institute for Healthcare Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FDN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CLINICINC ↗
- Who funds PATIENT-CENTERED PRIMARY CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation ↗
- Who funds Teaching Kitchen Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MEDSTAR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds RESTOREOKC INC ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Health Enhancement Research Organization Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ST LUCIE COUNTY HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds AdventHealth Kansas City Foundation ↗
- Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Grandview Foundation ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds Carilion Medical Center ↗
- Who funds ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Ardmore Inc · McCrory Foundation · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · The Daube Family Foundation Inc · Jerome Westheimer Family Foundation · Versacare Inc · United Way of South Central Oklahoma Inc · MHM Support Services · Public Health Institute · Mercy Hospital Ardmore
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ardmore Institute of Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
- Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc — 16% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Good Shepherd Community Clinicinc — 5% of income from government
- Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.