· Private foundation
Versacare Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k46 grants · $244k
- $10k–50k123 grants · $2.1M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $530k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FLORIDA CONFERENCE OFFICE OF EDUCATION | $150,000 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL MEDICAL | $150,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S CARE | $100,000 |
| WATER FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL | $70,000 |
| ANDREWS UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| WHOLELIFE CHURCH | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| THUMBS UP INC | $40,000 |
| GREATER NEW YORK CONFERENCE OF SDA | $40,000 |
| HOLBROOK INDIAN SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| INTER AMERICAN DIVISION OF SDA NUTRITION FOR LIFE | $40,000 |
| ORCHARD PARK SDA CHURCH | $40,000 |
| BEREAN TRANSFORMATION CENTER OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS | $40,000 |
| PACIFIC UNION CONFERENCE OF SDA | $40,000 |
| FARM STEW INTERNATIONAL | $39,210 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $541k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
95 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 115 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAdventist Health International4× · 2020–2024 · $600k · revenue +28%
- TUTHE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $168k · revenue +12%
- FSFARM STEW INTERNATIONAL4× · 2020–2024 · $104k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $216k
- LSLA SIERRA UNIV-CNTRFOR CONFLICT RESOLone grant, 2020 · $100k
- MSMACEDONIA SDA CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…
Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community
Providing guality Christian education to the network generation
Education - private christian school grades k-12
Rooted Ministries endeavors to train, equip, and empower people to a greater, Christ-centered destiny in Gulu, Uganda, and Orange County, California. Rooted Ministries Nursery and Primary School, and Rooted Ministries Secondary Academy…
His university provides graduate and undergraduate degree and diploma education and training for his family ministry specialists who desire to pursue careers in counseling and ministry.
Tcs is an independent christian school that prepares young men and women for college and life by providing challenging opportunities to excel in the vital areas of faith, virtue and knowledge.
Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.
The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Thumbs Up Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 79 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 523 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Adventist Health International ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FARM STEW INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CAUGHT UP ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIPS FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Thumbs Up Inc ↗
- Who funds US DREAM ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds TIME FOR EQUALITY IN ADVENTIST MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ADVENT HOPE VENTURES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sffc Foundation Inc · Archie Tonge Education Fund · Asi Missions Inc · Winifred Stevens Foundation · Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation · Bainum Family Foundation · The Sir Philip Sidney Foundation · The Hernan & Orfi Barros Foundation · Ardmore Institute of Health · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Irvin C & Evea J Bainum Foundation Inc · The Peterson Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Versacare Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Washington Adventist University — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Versacare Inc?
Find your warmest path to Versacare Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.