How much did THE DAUBE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of THE DAUBE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

shelter

2020

grace

2021

—

2022

reliefeducational

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k20 grants · $43k
$10k–50k2 grants · $45k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

DORNICK HILLS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION$35,000
CASA$10,000
COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC$7,000
FOOD AND RESOURCES CENTER OF SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC$4,500
MARINES TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$3,500
MILL CREEK SCHOOLS$3,500
FOOD FOR PETS$3,000
GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CLINIC$3,000
ADVANCED BLESSINGS FOUNDATION$2,500
HEROES WITH HOPE FOR SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA$2,000
KIDS INC$1,500
ARDMORE SOUP KITCHEN$1,500
NAOMI HOUSE INC$1,000
AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$837k · 38 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$837k

$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+40%

Still filing today

53%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $112k · revenue +493%
GS
GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CLINIC
7× · 2018–2024 · $42k · revenue +1057%
DIRECT RELIEF
2× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +93%

Funded once

MAP INTERNATIONALgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +63%
BF
BARNABAS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $5k
OD
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ardmore Habitat for Humanity Inc

To build houses for people in need and to give them a stepping stone to a better life.

Housing & Shelter

Ardmore Chamber of Commerce

To encourage, foster and stimulate commerce, trade, business finance and professional interests: to stimulate, encourage and promote cooperation and exchange among businesses; to promote, advance and stimulate civic, business, commercial,…

—

Mercy Health Foundation Ardmore

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—

Ardmore Animal Care Inc

To provide humane treatment for unwanted animals and promote responsible pet ownership. received 2,930 animals, 1,585 adopted out, 5,187 neuter operations, 6,423 pet owners were educated, 8,579 pets treated at clinics.

Animals

East Ardmore Revitalization Inc

To revitalize the east side of ardmore, ok for lower income people. funds are being raised to rebuild and repair buildings, parks, homes, and facilities in a poorer part of the community of ardmore, ok.

Community Improvement

Ardmore Enterprises Inc

Ardmore empowers people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live fulfilling lives defined by independence, choice, inclusion, and community engagement. we support people to live the lives they choose on their own terms.

Employment

Oklahoma Saved By Grace Restoration

To rehabilitate homeless and drug addicts

Religion

Ardmore Inc

Provides services to individuals who have mental & other developmental disabilities

—

Richard and Barbara Moore Family

Philanthropy

Food and Resource Center of South

Provide food and counseling to underpriviledged in 4 oklahoma counties.

Food & Nutrition

Morehouse Community Improvement

Child development thru head start program

Education

Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service

To provide ambulance and emergency medical services to carter and eastern jefferson counties, ok, home to some 49,000 people.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ardmore Family Literacy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Direct Relief. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

14%

182/1,288

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/27

Grantees still filing

19/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$518,700Recreation & Sports$197,500Health$66,750International$40,000Food & Nutrition$26,500Human Services$23,500Civil Rights$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McCrory FoundationOK37.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McCrory Foundation · Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation · Jerome Westheimer Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Ardmore Inc · The Merrick Foundation · United Way of South Central Oklahoma Inc · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · Kohaw Foundation Inc · Beverly Westheimer Wellnitz Charitable · Charles B Goddard Foundation Trust · Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc · The Waters Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE DAUBE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DORNICK HILLS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833219914 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DORNICK HILLS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 84% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Daube Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Daube Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE DAUBE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Daube Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE DAUBE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Daube Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph