· Private foundation
Anthony-Maymudes Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Fleet Fund | $15,000 |
| Lily House | $15,000 |
| Outer Cape Health Services | $15,000 |
| Wellfleet Preservation Hall | $15,000 |
| Wellfleet Conservation Trust | $10,000 |
| Team Read | $10,000 |
| Washington Progress Fund | $10,000 |
| Seattle Childrens Playgarden | $10,000 |
| Neighborhood House | $7,000 |
| Friends of the Wellfleet Library | $5,000 |
| APCC | $5,000 |
| Washington Budget and Policy Center | $5,000 |
| Maui United Way | $5,000 |
| Jubilee Womens Center | $5,000 |
| Refugee Womens Alliance | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $316k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFLEET FUND INC6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +124% · 28% of their budget
- WPWELLFLEET PRESERVATION HALL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +20%
- RSRAINIER SCHOLARS5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +244%
Funded once
- OAOPEN ARMS INCone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue +13% · 28% of their budget
- SVSocial Venture Partners Internationone grant, 2021 · $8k
- SVSocial Venture Partners Interone grant, 2020 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.
Through Jazz education that liberates and inspires, Seattle JazzED increase access in the music room, celebrates student expression, and builds lasting connection rooted in community.
Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…
School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…
The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Sahar Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FLEET FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WELLFLEET CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE LILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WELLFLEET PRESERVATION HALL INC ↗
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds OUTER CAPE HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDRENS PLAYGARDEN ↗
- Who funds PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds Team Read ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood House INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds EASTSIDE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Washington Progress Fund ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE BABY ↗
- Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds EarthGen Fka WA Green Schools ↗
- Who funds SHOLEM EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds Giddens School ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL VOICE ↗
- Who funds Refugee Womens Alliance ↗
- Who funds Denise Louie Education center ↗
- Who funds MAUI UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Boyer Children's Clinic ↗
- Who funds Brightspark Early Learning Services ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSAL MATH MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds COALITION ENDING GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
- Who funds Zeno ↗
- Who funds Win Win Network ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Ridge Road Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Raikes Foundation · Stolte Family Foundation · United Way of King County · The Bullitt Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · School's Out Washington
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anthony-Maymudes Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Outer Cape Health Services Inc — 18% of income from government
- The Lily House Inc — 13% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- National Yiddish Book Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wellfleet Preservation Hall Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anthony-Maymudes Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Anthony-Maymudes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.