Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stolte Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
97
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$650k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$20MPhilanthropy$9.3MEducation$7.0MHuman Services$3.3MYouth Development$3.0MCommunity Improvement$2.1MCivil Rights$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $221k
  • $50k–250k64 grants · $6.1M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
$50,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$650,000
CLIMATE SOLUTIONS - SEATTLE$600,000
COMMUNITY CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESULTS$469,128
UTILITY INFORMATION ALLIANCE$300,000
MICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$200,000
EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE$200,000
WASHINGTON STATE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TRUST$175,000
WORLD RELIEF WESTERN WA - WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVAN$175,000
PARA LOS NIOS$175,000
VOICES OF TOMORROW$175,000
COMMUNITY NETWORK COUNCIL$175,000
WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS$175,000
CHILD CARE AWARE OF WASHINGTON$150,000
WINDWARD FUND$150,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRIME COALITION INC: $200k → 8%REALIZE IMPACT: $50k → 10%PRIME COALITION INC: $200k → 8%REALIZE IMPACT: $50k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $75k → 18%REALIZE IMPACT: $10k → 10%SOUTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $86k → 9%SOUTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $35k → 9%SOUTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 9%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $75k → 9%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $75k → 9%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $50k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $50k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $50k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $50k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $35k → 9%PEPS - PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $31k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $30k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $25k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $25k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $25k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $15k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $50k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $140k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $140k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $135k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $105k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $105k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $105k → 9%BYRD BARR PLACE (FOR BIPOC ED COALITION): $200k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $80k → 9%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCORPORATED: $50k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $50k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $30k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $10k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCORPORATED: $5k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $125k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $60k → 9%VIETNAMESE FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION FOR GREATER SEATTLE: $31k → 9%VIETNAMESE FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION FOR GREATER SEATTLE: $30k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION SERVICES: $45k → 9%VIETNAMESE FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION FOR GREATER SEATTLE: $3k → 9%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $25k → 9%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $25k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$42M · 107 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

107 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
86

Total granted

$42M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+20%

Still filing today

90%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    Washington Progress Fund
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +32%
  • CE
    Clean Energy Transition Institute
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +215% · 42% of their budget
  • PL
    Para Los Ninos de Highline
    8× · 2017–2024 · $921k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CS
    CLIMATE SOLUTIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $925k · revenue +70%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - EARTHLAB
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION (FOR EARTHLAB)
    one grant, 2022 · $200k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
2
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
3
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
4
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
5
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

—
6
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
7
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
8
Pathwaves Washington

Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.

Education
9
Washingtonians for Public Banking

Washingtonians for Public banking promotes education and civic engagement on public banking and banking reform within Washington state. The organization organizes, educates, and advocates for the establishment of public banking, and…

Community Improvement
10
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement
11
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
12
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bailadores De Bronce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Community FoundationsCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Elementary Literacy TutoringIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr18%29%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr15%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%2%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr15%19%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/192
the rest of the field
12%
4,744/38,776

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

185 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 185 of the 228 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
181/185
Grantees still filing
125/185
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLIMATE SOLUTIONS - SEATTLE — $5,869,050 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONS - SEATTLEUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $1,105,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONWESTED — $1,026,994 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $985,500 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $925,350 · OtherAsia Pacific Cultural Center — $775,000 · Other+91 more — $9,186,212 · Other+91 moreWINDWARD FUND — $1,210,000 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUNDLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $850,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATIO…WASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $800,000 · EnvironmentWASHINGTON CONSERVATI…EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE — $755,000 · EnvironmentEVERGREEN COLLABORATI…Grist Magazine Inc — $725,000 · EnvironmentGrist Magazine IncMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $680,000 · EnvironmentMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CO…Fuse Innovation Fund — $466,000 · EnvironmentINSTITUTE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION — $450,000 · EnvironmentFront and Centered — $440,000 · EnvironmentFUTUREWISE — $375,000 · Environment+20 more — $2,691,387 · Environment+20 moreUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $3,835,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING C…Washington Progress Fund — $1,895,000 · PhilanthropyWashington Progress …SEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,199,489 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONWASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS — $610,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON ALLIANCE …Washington State Family And Community Engagement Trust — $529,000 · PhilanthropyWashington State Fam…+13 more — $1,267,571 · Philanthropy+13 moreCOMMUNITY CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESULTS — $1,875,767 · EducationCOMMUNITY C…Clean Energy Transition Institute — $1,030,000 · EducationClean Energ…Para Los Ninos de Highline — $920,724 · EducationPara Los Ni…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $375,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …Zeno — $339,777 · EducationZenoSoutheast Seattle Education Coalition — $280,000 · Education+10 more — $528,625 · Education+10 moreOPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES — $730,000 · Human ServicesLatino Community Fund of Washington State — $425,000 · Human ServicesPRIME COALITION INC — $400,000 · Human ServicesBYRD BARR PLACE — $200,300 · Human ServicesMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER — $200,051 · Human ServicesPROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT — $136,535 · Human ServicesSouthwest Youth And Family Services — $128,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $121,450 · Human ServicesRealize Impact — $110,000 · Human Services+11 more — $420,725 · Human ServicesVOICES OF TOMORROW — $815,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY NETWORK COUNCIL — $805,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $405,800 · Youth DevelopmentBELONG Partners — $117,500 · Youth Development+3 more — $12,584 · Youth DevelopmentRVC SEATTLE — $580,927 · Community ImprovementTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION — $300,000 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS UTILITY BOARD OF MICHIGAN — $240,000 · Community ImprovementRural Peoples Platform — $175,000 · Community ImprovementSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST — $150,000 · Community ImprovementWin Win Network — $125,000 · Community ImprovementEconomic Opportunity Institute — $80,000 · Community ImprovementNONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON — $70,000 · Community Improvement+4 more — $31,025 · Community Improvement
Other$19,873,106Environment$9,442,387Philanthropy$9,336,060Education$5,349,893Human Services$2,872,061Youth Development$2,155,884Community Improvement$1,751,952

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $3,835,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetWashington Progress Fund — $1,895,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESULTS — $1,875,767 over 8y, 22% of budgetWINDWARD FUND — $1,210,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,199,489 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetClean Energy Transition Institute — $1,030,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $985,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $925,350 over 1y, 21% of budgetPara Los Ninos de Highline — $920,724 over 8y, 13% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $850,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetVOICES OF TOMORROW — $815,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY NETWORK COUNCIL — $805,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $800,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetAsia Pacific Cultural Center — $775,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE — $755,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetOPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES — $730,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc — $725,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $680,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSTART EARLY — $650,100 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS — $610,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $601,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRVC SEATTLE — $580,927 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetWashington State Family And Community Engagement Trust — $529,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetONEAMERICA — $511,165 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetFuse Innovation Fund — $466,000 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION — $450,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetFront and Centered — $440,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $425,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLatino Community Fund of Washington State — $425,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $405,800 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetPRIME COALITION INC — $400,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $375,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREENTRIKE — $375,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetFUTUREWISE — $375,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetCASCADIA CLEANTECH PRIZE — $350,000 over 5y, 99% of budgetZeno — $339,777 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetWashington Community Action Network Education & Research Fund — $325,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetEarthGen Fka WA Green Schools — $303,870 over 7y, 12% of budgetTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION — $300,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK DBA CHILD CARE AWARE WA — $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUTILITY INFORMATION ALLIANCE — $300,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE — $300,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetSoutheast Seattle Education Coalition — $280,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $275,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER — $270,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetForth Mobility Fund — $265,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR WASHINGTONS FUTURE — $250,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Washington Progress Fund ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESULTS ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Clean Energy Transition Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Para Los Ninos de Highline ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds VOICES OF TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY NETWORK COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Asia Pacific Cultural Center ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Grist Magazine Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds START EARLY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds Washington State Family And Community Engagement Trust ↗
  • Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Fuse Innovation Fund ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds Front and Centered ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Latino Community Fund of Washington State ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds PRIME COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
  • Who funds FUTUREWISE ↗
  • Who funds CASCADIA CLEANTECH PRIZE ↗
  • Who funds Zeno ↗
  • Who funds Washington Community Action Network Education & Research Fund ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationUnited Way of King Co…The Satterberg Founda…Gates FoundationThe Bullitt FoundationInatai FoundationMedina FoundationRaikes FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…Philanthropy NorthwestSchool's Out Washingt…
Seattle FoundationWA108.7× affinity101 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Medina Foundation · Raikes Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · School's Out Washington

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stolte Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Forth Mobility Fund — 7% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
  • Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stolte Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stolte Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 228 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines