· Private foundation
American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST PATRICKS DAY WITH A PURPOSE | $29,175 |
| BROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $6,405 |
| RESET MINISTRIES | $6,000 |
| GIBLER TEAM FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| MILFORD JR HIGH SCHOOL | $1,766 |
| CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS | $1,600 |
| BLUEBIRD BUS OF HOPE | $500 |
| HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION | $500 |
| CNE CARES | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +30%
- BABEECH ACRES2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +3%
- HAHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- HFHOMES FOR HOMES aka Homes 4 Homesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +160%
- SASTRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM INCone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue 0%
- R4REACH 4 THE SKYone grant, 2021 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ballot issue political action committee advocating for levy to support the homelessness population in Ohio.
Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.
Advocates on behalf of abused and neglected Children. Mobilizing our community to break the vicious cycle of child abuse and neglect and provide outstanding advocacy for abused and neglected children who are in the juvenile court system.
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
Enrich the lives of cats and communities in Greater Cincinnati by providing low-cost, high-quality spay/neuter services for ferals, strays and pets; offering trap-neuter-return and other outreach programs; and operating a no-kill adoption…
Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.
To educate, empower, enact dedicated to the healing and prevention of sexual violence in southeast ohio.
Provide services to the victims of domestic voilence
The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mount Orab Community Playground Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR HOMES aka Homes 4 Homes ↗
- Who funds STRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
- Who funds HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAGNOLIA RESOURCE ↗
- Who funds KNOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION INC 10730 OMAHA TRACE ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds CancerFree KIDS ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE OF PICKAWAY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LOVELIKEJJ ↗
- Who funds AUBREY ROSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc ↗
- Who funds League for Animal Welfare ↗
- Who funds MADE TO LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CURE STARTS NOW INC ↗
- Who funds YELLOW RIBBON SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADDICTION SERVICES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF SOUTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds GIVE LIKE A MOTHER ↗
- Who funds HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF WARREN COUNTY -OHIO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Millstone Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Interact for Health · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.