Skip to content
American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$34kArts & Culture$32kEducation$23kAnimals$21kHuman Services$17kHousing & Shelter$11kReligion$8kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
$1,766
Median grant
3
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PATRICKS DAY WITH A PURPOSE$29,175
BROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$6,405
RESET MINISTRIES$6,000
GIBLER TEAM FOUNDATION$2,500
MILFORD JR HIGH SCHOOL$1,766
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS$1,600
BLUEBIRD BUS OF HOPE$500
HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION$500
CNE CARES$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GIRLS OF VIRTUE: $787 → 14%AMERICAN WARRIORS INITIATIVE: $822 → 10%THE MAGNOLIA RESOURCE: $1k → 6%LOVE LIKE JJ: $250 → 12%CHILDREN'S HOME OF NORTHERN KENTUCK: $1k → 11%MOUNT ORAB COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND FND: $770 → 16%THE MAGNOLIA RESOURCE: $500 → 6%LOVE LIKE JJ: $1k → 6%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $500 → 16%GIVE LIKE A MOTHER: $960 → 9%BLUEBIRD BUS OF HOPE: $500 → 9%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $2k → 16%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $989 → 16%NEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $447 → 16%CINCINNATI ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIN: $580 → 16%COUNCIL ON AGING OF SOUTHWESTERN OH: $880 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
OH
NJ
KY
MD
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 11 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
71

Total granted

$73k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+31%

Still filing today

45%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +30%
  • BA
    BEECH ACRES
    2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +3%
  • HA
    HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOMES FOR HOMES aka Homes 4 Homesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +160%
  • SA
    STRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • R4
    REACH 4 THE SKY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Action for Housing Now

Ballot issue political action committee advocating for levy to support the homelessness population in Ohio.

—
2
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
3
Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour

Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
4
The Cincinnati Woman's Club Foundation
—
5
ProKids

Advocates on behalf of abused and neglected Children. Mobilizing our community to break the vicious cycle of child abuse and neglect and provide outstanding advocacy for abused and neglected children who are in the juvenile court system.

Civil Rights
6
Columbus Cares for Cats
—
7
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
8
Ohio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc

Enrich the lives of cats and communities in Greater Cincinnati by providing low-cost, high-quality spay/neuter services for ferals, strays and pets; offering trap-neuter-return and other outreach programs; and operating a no-kill adoption…

Animals
9
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.

Youth Development
10
Survivor Advocacy Outreach Program

To educate, empower, enact dedicated to the healing and prevention of sexual violence in southeast ohio.

Health
11
Southern Ohio Area Task Force on

Provide services to the victims of domestic voilence

Human Services
12
Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky

The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mount Orab Community Playground Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
30/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PATRICKS DAY WITH A PURPOSE: $29,175 · OtherST PATRICKS DAY WITH A PURPOSERESET MINISTRIES: $29,000 · OtherRESET MINISTRIESGIBLER TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $16,278 · OtherGIBLER TEAM FOUNDATION INCBROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $14,530 · OtherBROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY+47 more: $35,812 · Other+47 moreBEECH ACRES: $2,607 · Human ServicesBEECH ACR…THE MAGNOLIA RESOURCE: $1,803 · Human ServicesTHE MAGNO…LOVELIKEJJ: $1,367 · Human ServicesLOVELIKEJ…Children's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc: $1,280 · Human ServicesChildren'…GIVE LIKE A MOTHER: $960 · Human ServicesGIVE LIKE…Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio: $880 · Human ServicesCouncil o…AMERICAN WARRIOR INITIATIVE INC: $822 · Human ServicesAMERICAN …GIRLS OF VIRTUE INC: $787 · Human ServicesGIRLS OF …MOUNT ORAB COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND FUND INC: $770 · Human ServicesMOUNT ORA…Cincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $580 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $500 · Human ServicesBluebird Bus of Hope: $500 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $447 · Human ServicesHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · HealthCancerFree KIDS: $1,430 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $1,171 · HealthTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $1,165 · HealthADDICTION SERVICES COUNCIL: $1,000 · HealthNAMI OF SOUTHWEST OHIO: $997 · HealthMelanoma Know More: $757 · HealthHOMES FOR HOMES aka Homes 4 Homes: $4,260 · Housing & ShelterHAVEN HOUSE OF PICKAWAY COUNTY INC: $1,390 · Housing & ShelterON OUR WAY HOME INC: $630 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF BUTLER COUNTY INC: $250 · Housing & ShelterAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $250 · Housing & ShelterSTRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM INC: $3,355 · AnimalsLeague for Animal Welfare: $1,263 · AnimalsHUMANE ASSOCIATION OF WARREN COUNTY -OHIO: $945 · AnimalsCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $2,460 · PhilanthropyKNOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION INC 10730 OMAHA TRACE: $1,750 · PhilanthropyDRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $828 · PhilanthropyAUBREY ROSE FOUNDATION: $1,280 · EducationYELLOW RIBBON SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationMindPeace Cincinnati: $590 · Education
Other$124,795Human Services$13,303Health$9,020Housing & Shelter$6,780Animals$5,563Philanthropy$5,038Education$2,870

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $14,530 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHOMES FOR HOMES aka Homes 4 Homes: $4,260 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSTRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM INC: $3,355 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEECH ACRES: $2,607 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $2,460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAGNOLIA RESOURCE: $1,803 over 2y, 15% of budgetKNOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION INC 10730 OMAHA TRACE: $1,750 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancerFree KIDS: $1,430 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE OF PICKAWAY COUNTY INC: $1,390 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOVELIKEJJ: $1,367 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetChildren's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc: $1,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBREY ROSE FOUNDATION: $1,280 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeague for Animal Welfare: $1,263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADE TO LOVE INC: $1,216 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $1,171 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $1,165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetADDICTION SERVICES COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI OF SOUTHWEST OHIO: $997 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVE LIKE A MOTHER: $960 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE ASSOCIATION OF WARREN COUNTY -OHIO: $945 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADVENTURE CREW: $883 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCouncil on Aging of Southwestern Ohio: $880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $878 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS: $832 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $828 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN WARRIOR INITIATIVE INC: $822 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT ORAB COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND FUND INC: $770 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetJunior League of Cincinnati: $758 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMelanoma Know More: $757 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES: $675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON OUR WAY HOME INC: $630 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMindPeace Cincinnati: $590 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrighton Center Inc: $562 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInter Parish Ministry Inc: $535 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBluebird Bus of Hope: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCINCINNATI NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Theatre of Cincinnati: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY ALLIANCE OHIO: $458 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $447 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BUTLER COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…Jack J Smith Jr Chari…Andrew Jergens Founda…Pfau Charitable Found…Millstone FundGe Aerospace Foundati…Josephine S Russell C…John a Schroth Family…Interact for HealthCarol Ann and Ralph V…The Wohlgemuth Hersch…Robert a & Marian K K…
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH44.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Millstone Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Interact for Health · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Homeland Title Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Homeland Title’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home