Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Epilepsy Society

The AMERICAN EPILEPSY SOCIETY promotes research and education for professionals dedicated to the prevention, treatment, and cure of epilepsy.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$151k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$5.3MScience & Tech$3.6MEducation$2.9MRecreation & Sports$422kCommunity Improvement$20k
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 30 grants below total $1,676,629 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,936,470 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $259,841 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.4M
$50,800
Median grant
20
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE REGENTS OF UNIV OF CA - SAN FRANCISCO$150,800
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$150,800
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL RESEARCH$135,800
NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$108,494
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$92,155
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$75,800
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$75,800
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$75,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CENTRAL LOCKBOX$75,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$70,800
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$50,800
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$50,800
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,800
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$50,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE FOR HYPOTHALAMIC HARMARTOMA: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of American Epilepsy Society’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 11% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 6% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

American Epilepsy Societylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.5M · 58 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
49

Total granted

$8.5M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsScience & TechHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    8× · 2017–2025 · $528k · revenue +67%
  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $384k · revenue +41%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    8× · 2018–2025 · $339k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LENNOX AND LOMBROSO FUND FOR RESEARCH AND TRAINING
    one grant, 2019 · $700k · revenue -59% · 72% of their budget
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +23%
  • RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $72k · revenue -32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Treatments for Epilepsy and Symptoms of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%57%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/72
Grantees still filing
63/72
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE LENNOX AND LOMBROSO FUND FOR RESEARCH AND TRAINING — $700,000 · OtherTHE LENNOX AND LOMBROSO FUND FOR RESEARCH AND TRAINI…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $386,293 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $350,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCONEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $244,999 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $240,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $225,800 · OtherBRIGHAM & WOMEN'S PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION INC — $217,700 · Other+46 more — $3,298,832 · Other+46 moreBaylor College of Medicine — $527,535 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $352,962 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSY…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $341,250 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $339,298 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SI…Yale University — $222,000 · EducationYale UniversityEmory University — $220,000 · EducationEmory UniversityNew York University — $210,000 · EducationNew York UniversityTrustees of Tufts College — $191,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $138,770 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $130,494 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $130,000 · Education+23 more — $1,092,980 · Education+23 moreAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION — $318,250 · HealthAMERICAN BRAIN FOUN…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $215,800 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL…THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN — $153,189 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINI…CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $152,470 · HealthCHILDREN'S RESEARCH…THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $115,000 · HealthTHE J DAVID GLADSTO…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $112,500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSP…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $110,905 · HealthVanderbilt Universi…THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $90,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $81,877 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $75,800 · Health+16 more — $453,193 · Health+16 moreNorthwestern University — $383,655 · Recreation & SportsGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC — $203,000 · Science & TechCANDID — $11,500 · PhilanthropyHope for Hypothalamic Hamartomas — $6,000 · Human Services
Other$5,665,174Education$3,896,789Health$2,078,984Recreation & Sports$383,655Science & Tech$203,000Philanthropy$11,500Human Services$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE LENNOX AND LOMBROSO FUND FOR RESEARCH AND TRAINING — $700,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $527,535 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $383,655 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $352,962 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $341,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $339,298 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION — $318,250 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetYale University — $222,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $220,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $215,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $210,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC — $203,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $191,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY — $173,800 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN — $153,189 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $152,470 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $138,770 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $130,494 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $112,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $110,905 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $109,964 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetM Club of the University of Michigan — $105,000 over 4y, 79% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $81,877 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $72,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $62,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $57,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $51,293 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $50,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $50,423 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $45,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY INSTITUTE — $43,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $42,960 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $41,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $41,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LENNOX AND LOMBROSO FUND FOR RESEARCH AND TRAINING
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds M Club of the University of Michigan

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New YorkNY21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · American Cancer Society Inc · Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc · Yale University · University of Pittsburgh · National Multiple Sclerosis Society · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Washington University · Johns Hopkins University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Epilepsy Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Epilepsy Society?

Find your warmest path to American Epilepsy Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph