Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Contract Bridge League Charity Foundation Corp

The acbl charity foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in all our communities by providing effective grants on a rotational basis through its 25 districts, by providing good stewardship in the management of funds received through its charity games, assesing and responding to emerging and changing needs as defined by the…

$190k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$212kInternational$136kPublic Safety & Disaster$78kFood & Nutrition$78kHuman Services$76kRecreation & Sports$51kPhilanthropy$45kAnimals$44kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $33,022 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $190,132 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $157,110 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$916k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEF USA$18,022
World Central Kitchen$7,500
Direct Relief$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY VERDE HOMELESS COALITION: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW: $5k → 8%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5k → 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%WALNUT AVENUE FAMILY & WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 13%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $6k → 9%MALI NIETA FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $5k → 23%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT: $6k → 21%SAFEHOME INC: $5k → 5%LUSSIER COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER: $15k → 10%SOCIETY OF ST VICENT DE PAUL: $5k → 16%FAMILY TO FAMILY CONNECTION: $5k → 13%WOMEN SHELTER OF LONG BEACH: $5k → 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%RAINBOW SERVICES: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $53k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$184k · 5 repeat orgs$685k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
87

Total granted

$184k
$667k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $48k · revenue +32%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $40k · revenue +52%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    2× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $53k · revenue +46%
  • EF
    ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +99%
  • CY
    CITY YOUTH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
10
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
11
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
12
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Soldier Art Workshops. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceNative Hawaiian Community D…Affordable Housing Developm…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Senior LivingPublic University Foundatio…Veteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterFallen First Responder Supp…Education Equity LeadershipChild and Family ServicesProfessional Ballet Compani…Senior Support ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports Booster Organi…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/95
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,470

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/88
Grantees still filing
63/88
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $52,614 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red C…CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INCLUSSIER COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesLUSSIER COMMUNITY EDUCA…MALI NIETA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesMALI NIETA FOUNDATION+13 more — $67,050 · Human Services+13 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $47,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & …ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDAT…OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $22,500 · HealthOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATI…STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $10,000 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING PLACE…CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC — $10,000 · HealthCHURCH HEALTH CENTER O…MIND&MELODY INC — $10,000 · HealthMIND&MELODY INCIWEC INC Ronald R Rabjohns — $7,500 · HealthDEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $7,450 · Health+6 more — $30,000 · Health+6 moreSUNSET RIDGE-MIDDLEFORK ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · OtherSUNSET RIDGE-MIDDLEFORK ASSOCIATI…MEALS AT HOME — $10,000 · OtherOPERATION NOEL — $10,000 · OtherWORLD RENEW — $9,000 · OtherWorld Renew — $9,000 · OtherGreater Houston Women's Foundation — $10,000 · OtherCITY YOUTH MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 · OtherCITY YOUTH MINISTRIES INCLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $10,000 · OtherBALLET MEMPHIS CORPORATION — $10,000 · OtherCANDORFUL INC — $10,000 · Other+28 more — $148,000 · Other+28 moreAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $41,663 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUN…DIRECT RELIEF — $37,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $18,022 · InternationalUNITED STATES F…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $17,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL K…Liga International — $6,000 · InternationalADVANCE COMMUNITY — $5,000 · InternationalTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $15,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGIFTS TO GIVE INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropySHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyNORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK — $7,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW PA INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionCALL PRIMROSE — $5,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS WITH FOUR PAWS INC — $6,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $6,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $6,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND STRIPES INC — $5,000 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · AnimalsPets Lifeline Inc — $5,000 · AnimalsERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $5,000 · Animals
Human Services$184,664Health$174,950Other$266,000International$125,685Philanthropy$57,500Food & Nutrition$47,000Animals$38,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $52,614 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $41,663 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITY YOUTH MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $18,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUSSIER COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDORFUL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS AT HOME — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION NOEL — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGIFTS TO GIVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBALLET MEMPHIS CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Renew — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIWEC INC Ronald R Rabjohns — $7,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $7,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Action Network of Detroit — $6,050 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS WITH FOUR PAWS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OXNARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLiga International — $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSEE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSoldier Art Workshops — $5,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENERAL ASSEMBLY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget10000 DEGREES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE US SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gap FoundationAetna Foundation IncArthur J Gallagher Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…AbbVie FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…Chubb Charitable Foun…The Blackbaud Giving …Ge Aerospace Foundati…Verizon FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…
The Gap FoundationCA12.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gap Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Contract Bridge League Charity Foundation Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Contract Bridge League Charity Foundation Corp?

Find your warmest path to American Contract Bridge League Charity Foundation Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home