Skip to content
Allpeoplebehappy Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Allpeoplebehappy Foundation

Mission: Building a World Where All People Can Be Happy.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$903k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$1.3MPhilanthropy$225kFood & Nutrition$153kEducation$103kHealth$34kCrime & Legal$15kEnvironment$12kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
  • $250k+1 grant · $903k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AllPeopleBeHappy$903,495
Project Allianza$67,000
Little Sisters Fund$40,000
ROMP Global$15,000
Ugandan Water Project$14,400
Green Empowerment$12,000
Saha Global$10,000
Africa Development Promise$9,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A Breeze of Hope: $15k → 10%Africa Development Promise: $10k → 8%A Breeze of Hope Foundation: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
CA
CO
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 18 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$1.7M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-7%

Still filing today

94%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A(
    ALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD)
    3× · 2021–2024 · $924k · revenue +276% · 35% of their budget
  • GE
    GREEN EMPOWERMENT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $151k · revenue +71%
  • PA
    PROJECT ALIANZA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +12% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • MC
    Magpie Community Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CV
    CLINICA VERDE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -86%
  • VH
    VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maia

MAIA is creating a generation of empowered leaders who have the knowledge and resources they need to lead choice-filled lives, break cycles of poverty, and ignite transformational change in their communities.

International
2
Aqua-Africa Inc

Transform east african communities by providing access to clean well water and water systems.

International
3
Splash International

The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…

Environment
4
Girls Education Collaborative Inc

GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.

International
5
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
6
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
7
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
8
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
9
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
10
Safe Water Network

Safe water network envisions a world with healthy, thriving communities managing their supply of safe water. our mission is to develop and scale-up innovative solutions, document best practices and build partnerships to reach millions with…

Environment
11
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
12
Women in Progress Inc

Women in Progress dba Global Mamas works to achieve economic independence of African women and alleviate poverty at a grassroots level by creating jobs and income generation opportunities that generate a sustainable, living wage and at the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visions Global Empowerment; the most unlike its peers is Maji Safi Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD): $923,895 · PhilanthropyALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD)GREEN EMPOWERMENT: $151,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN EMPOWERMENTSUNSAR MAYA INC: $40,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $26,050 · PhilanthropyLITTLE SISTERS FUND INC: $73,435 · InternationalLITTLE SISTERS…LIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $40,000 · InternationalLIFENET INTERN…Ugandan Water Project: $34,400 · InternationalUgandan Water …INDEGO AFRICA PROJECT: $30,000 · InternationalINDEGO AFRICA …Rooted Wisdom Africa Into Your Hands: $16,900 · InternationalRooted Wisdom …VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $10,000 · InternationalAmigos de las Americas: $9,750 · InternationalYSPANIOLA INCORPORATED: $7,827 · International+1 more: $5,700 · InternationalPROJECT ALIANZA INC: $130,000 · Food & NutritionEDUCATION ACROSS BORDERS: $52,825 · EducationTHE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC: $39,477 · EducationSUPERKIDS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationTHE PANGEA NETWORK: $30,225 · Human ServicesA BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesAFRICA DEVELOPMENT PROMISE: $9,850 · Human ServicesGLOBAL EMERGENCY CARE INC: $26,000 · HealthRange Of Motion Project: $15,000 · HealthSAHA GLOBAL INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF NEPAL PARIWAR FOUNDATION: $18,740 · OtherMagpie Community Foundation: $10,000 · OtherCLINICA VERDE: $10,000 · OtherNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,000 · Other
Philanthropy$1,140,945International$228,012Food & Nutrition$130,000Education$122,302Human Services$65,075Health$41,000Environment$40,000Other$48,740

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD): $923,895 over 3y, 35% of budgetGREEN EMPOWERMENT: $151,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetPROJECT ALIANZA INC: $130,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS FUND INC: $73,435 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetEDUCATION ACROSS BORDERS: $52,825 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSUNSAR MAYA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetSAHA GLOBAL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC: $39,477 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUgandan Water Project: $34,400 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PANGEA NETWORK: $30,225 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetINDEGO AFRICA PROJECT: $30,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMAJI SAFI GROUP: $26,050 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetGLOBAL EMERGENCY CARE INC: $26,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetA BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRooted Wisdom Africa Into Your Hands: $16,900 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetRange Of Motion Project: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCLINICA VERDE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICA DEVELOPMENT PROMISE: $9,850 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAmigos de las Americas: $9,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYSPANIOLA INCORPORATED: $7,827 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT: $5,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Together Women RiseGlobalgiving Foundati…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Silicon Valley Commun…Shell USA Company Fou…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Raymond James Charita…
Together Women RiseSC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Together Women Rise · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allpeoplebehappy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allpeoplebehappy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allpeoplebehappy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Allpeoplebehappy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $8k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allpeoplebehappy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home