· Public charity
Allpeoplebehappy Foundation
Mission: Building a World Where All People Can Be Happy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
- $250k+1 grant · $903k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AllPeopleBeHappy | $903,495 |
| Project Allianza | $67,000 |
| Little Sisters Fund | $40,000 |
| ROMP Global | $15,000 |
| Ugandan Water Project | $14,400 |
| Green Empowerment | $12,000 |
| Saha Global | $10,000 |
| Africa Development Promise | $9,850 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- A(ALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD)3× · 2021–2024 · $924k · revenue +276% · 35% of their budget
- GEGREEN EMPOWERMENT5× · 2020–2024 · $151k · revenue +67%
- PAPROJECT ALIANZA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +12% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- MCMagpie Community Foundationone grant, 2022 · $10k
- VHVILLAGE HEALTH WORKSone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -9%
- CVCLINICA VERDEone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
MAIA is creating a generation of empowered leaders who have the knowledge and resources they need to lead choice-filled lives, break cycles of poverty, and ignite transformational change in their communities.
Transform east african communities by providing access to clean well water and water systems.
The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…
GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.
Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.
To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.
Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…
Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
Safe water network envisions a world with healthy, thriving communities managing their supply of safe water. our mission is to develop and scale-up innovative solutions, document best practices and build partnerships to reach millions with…
World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…
Women in Progress dba Global Mamas works to achieve economic independence of African women and alleviate poverty at a grassroots level by creating jobs and income generation opportunities that generate a sustainable, living wage and at the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visions Global Empowerment and the most unlike its peers is Maji Safi Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 19. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD) ↗
- Who funds GREEN EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ALIANZA INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION ACROSS BORDERS ↗
- Who funds LIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SAHA GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds SUNSAR MAYA INC ↗
- Who funds THE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ugandan Water Project ↗
- Who funds THE PANGEA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds INDEGO AFRICA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SUPERKIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAJI SAFI GROUP ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EMERGENCY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rooted Wisdom Africa Into Your Hands ↗
- Who funds Range Of Motion Project ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds CLINICA VERDE ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds AFRICA DEVELOPMENT PROMISE ↗
- Who funds Amigos de las Americas ↗
- Who funds YSPANIOLA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds VISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Together Women Rise · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allpeoplebehappy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allpeoplebehappy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Allpeoplebehappy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.