Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allen H Roth Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$119k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$504kReligion$63kHealth$61kRecreation & Sports$34kEducation$8kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $119k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$118,559
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$5,000
CAMP CHABAD$5,000
BBYO$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
B'NAI B'RITH$2,000
LAURI BAUER FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $2k → 11%US HOLOCAUST: $6k → 14%THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $8k → 10%NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $5k → 12%CAMP CHABAD: $10k → 16%MARIMETA CAMP: $6k → 8%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER AT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $3k → 19%US HOLOCAUST: $3k → 14%NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $5k → 12%CAMP CHABAD: $8k → 16%CAMPER A CO MARIMETA CAMP: $6k → 8%HILLEL: $2k → 19%NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $5k → 12%CAMP CHABAD: $5k → 16%LAURI BAUER FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%MISERICORDIA: $3k → 14%BBYO: $3k → 14%NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $3k → 12%CAMP CHABAD: $5k → 16%MISERICORDIA: $3k → 14%B'NAI B'RITH SPORTS LODGE: $2k → 14%NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $3k → 12%CAMP CHABAD: $5k → 16%MISERICORDIA: $3k → 14%B'NAI B'RITH SPORTS LODGE: $2k → 14%CAMP CHABAD: $5k → 16%B'NAI B'RITH SPORTS LODGE: $2k → 14%CAMP CHABAD: $5k → 16%KESHET: $5k → 14%CAMP CHABAD: $5k → 16%KESHET: $5k → 14%KESHET: $3k → 14%KESHET: $3k → 14%KESHET: $3k → 14%KESHET: $3k → 14%KESHET: $3k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $120k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $119k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $112k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $110k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $20k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $16k → 14%MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $5k → 14%MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $5k → 14%TRUTH HOPE & JUSTICE: $3k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS: $3k → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
CO
MO
VA
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$667k · 22 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
15

Total granted

$667k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+40%

Still filing today

36%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationInternationalCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    7× · 2017–2025 · $497k · revenue +13%
  • K
    KESHET
    7× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +61%
  • MR
    MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST
    2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • CA
    CAMPER A CO MARIMETA CAMP
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
3
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
12
Benaroya Research Institute At Virginia

To advance the science that will predict, prevent, reverse, and cure diseases of the immune system such as autoimmune disease, allergy, and asthma.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Midwest Bbq for the Brave Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $497,073 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO+1 more: $475 · PhilanthropyCAMP CHABAD: $47,500 · OtherCAMP CHABADKESHET: $22,575 · OtherKESHETNATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $20,425 · OtherNATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $8,500 · OtherB'NAI B'RITH SPORTS LODGE: $8,000 · OtherMISERICORDIA: $7,500 · Other+20 more: $55,400 · Other+20 moreMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $10,000 · HealthTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $7,500 · HealthLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,325 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 · HealthLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $1,150 · HealthB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,700 · Civil RightsTHE BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $180 · EducationBest Buddies International Inc: $100 · International
Philanthropy$497,548Other$179,400Health$26,975Youth Development$3,000Civil Rights$1,700Education$180International$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $497,073 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKESHET: $22,575 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB NAI B RITH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVASCULITIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST BBQ FOR THE BRAVE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $475 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds B NAI B RITH ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VASCULITIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST BBQ FOR THE BRAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen H Roth Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen H Roth Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allen H Roth Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Allen H Roth Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allen H Roth Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph