Skip to content
Albuquerque Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Albuquerque Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive contributions, gifts, grants, or bequests of property to maintain, use, and apply the income and the principal for charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$151kHuman Services$123kArts & Culture$117kEducation$59kInternational$54kReligion$52kPhilanthropy$25kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $85,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $140,416 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,416 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NM MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY & SCI$60,000
ROTARY CLUB OF RUIDOSO FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NM CHILD FIRST NETWORK: $35k → 23%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER: $25k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$244k · 5 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$244k
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+48%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Silver Horizons New Mexico Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $85k · revenue +24%
  • ES
    EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $49k · revenue +169%
  • CG
    CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM
    2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • SO
    SHIMA OF NAVAJOLAND
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +228% · 48% of their budget
  • SC
    Students Clothing Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
3
Cooking With Kids Inc

Cooking with kids educates and empowers children and families to make healthy food choices through hands-on nutrition education with fresh, affordable foods.

Youth Development
4
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
5
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
6
New Mexico Scottish Rite Foundation
—
7
Feed New Mexico Kids Inc

Feed New Mexico Kids, Inc. is on a mission to eradicate childhood hunger in New Mexico. Through donations of nutritious stackable food items that a child of the age of five years old and up may open and eat on the spot. We aim to provide…

Food & Nutrition
8
Four Corners Mission
Unclassified
9
Roadrunner Food Bank Inc

To feed every hungry person today, to seed partnerships that build self- sufficiency for tomorrow, and lead to achieve our vision of permanently ending hunger in new mexico.

Food & Nutrition
10
Nm Building Education Foundation
—
11
New Mexico Foundation for Open Government

To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.

Crime & Legal
12
Food Bank of Eastern New Mexico

The organization solicits, collects and purchases food and grocery items for distribution to other nonprofit organizations such as churches, clubs and agencies with programs to feed the ill, infants/children, elderly and needy. the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Explora Science Center & Children's Museum of Albuquerque Inc; the most unlike its peers is R4 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW MEXICO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUND…SHIMA OF NAVAJOLAND: $52,175 · OtherSHIMA OF NAVAJOLANDROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5520: $35,068 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5520ROTARY CLUB OF RUIDOSO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF RUIDOSO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,883 · OtherTHE NAVAJO NATION: $8,405 · Other+8 more: $55,967 · Other+8 moreSilver Horizons New Mexico Inc: $84,916 · Human ServicesSilver Horizons New Mexico IncCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM: $45,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NMNEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INC: $35,237 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INCStudents Clothing Bank: $35,237 · Human ServicesStudents Clothing BankTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $53,550 · InternationalTHE ROTAR…EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $48,565 · Arts & CultureHORIZONS STUDENT OPPORTUNITIES AND RESULTS FOR NEW MEXICO INC: $29,983 · EducationALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT: $19,678 · Food & NutritionEast Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP: $12,500 · Food & NutritionR4 Foundation: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SALVATION ARMY ALBUQUERQUE RESIDENCES INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$247,498Human Services$200,390International$53,550Arts & Culture$48,565Education$39,983Food & Nutrition$32,178Philanthropy$25,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilver Horizons New Mexico Inc: $84,916 over 3y, 18% of budgetNEW MEXICO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $53,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $48,565 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM: $45,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INC: $35,237 over 1y, 48% of budgetStudents Clothing Bank: $35,237 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetHORIZONS STUDENT OPPORTUNITIES AND RESULTS FOR NEW MEXICO INC: $29,983 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetR4 Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT: $19,678 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEast Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP: $12,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY ALBUQUERQUE RESIDENCES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetST FELIX PANTRY INC: $7,086 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO: $6,678 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Nusenda FoundationPnm Tnmp FoundationCarl C Anderson Sr an…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albuquerque Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albuquerque Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albuquerque Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home