· Public charity
Albuquerque Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc
To solicit and receive contributions, gifts, grants, or bequests of property to maintain, use, and apply the income and the principal for charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $85,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $140,416 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,416 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NM MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY & SCI | $60,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF RUIDOSO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSilver Horizons New Mexico Inc3× · 2021–2023 · $85k · revenue +24%
- ESEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC3× · 2017–2023 · $49k · revenue +169%
- CGCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- SOSHIMA OF NAVAJOLANDone grant, 2020 · $52k
- NMNEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +228% · 48% of their budget
- SCStudents Clothing Bankgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +77%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.
Cooking with kids educates and empowers children and families to make healthy food choices through hands-on nutrition education with fresh, affordable foods.
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
Feed New Mexico Kids, Inc. is on a mission to eradicate childhood hunger in New Mexico. Through donations of nutritious stackable food items that a child of the age of five years old and up may open and eat on the spot. We aim to provide…
To feed every hungry person today, to seed partnerships that build self- sufficiency for tomorrow, and lead to achieve our vision of permanently ending hunger in new mexico.
To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.
The organization solicits, collects and purchases food and grocery items for distribution to other nonprofit organizations such as churches, clubs and agencies with programs to feed the ill, infants/children, elderly and needy. the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Explora Science Center & Children's Museum of Albuquerque Inc and the most unlike its peers is R4 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Silver Horizons New Mexico Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Students Clothing Bank ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS STUDENT OPPORTUNITIES AND RESULTS FOR NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds R4 Foundation ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds East Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ALBUQUERQUE RESIDENCES INC ↗
- Who funds ST FELIX PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Albuquerque Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.