· Private foundation
Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of ALBERT & RINA BROCCHINI FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JUNIOR SHOW & AUCTION COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| RIPON QUARTERBACK CLUB | $7,100 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION | $6,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| BETHANY HOME SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE | $2,500 |
| RIPON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $2,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA | $1,500 |
| FRIENDS OF RIPON SCHOOLS | $1,000 |
| WE ARE RIPON | $1,000 |
| CA FOUNDATION FOR AG IN THE CLASSROOM | $1,000 |
| GREAT VALLEY BOOKFEST | $1,000 |
| THOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,000 |
| LOVE RIPON | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +86%
- GEGIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE8× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +213%
- VCVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL3× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- CTCOLOR THE SKIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue ×17
- RHRIPON HIGH SCHOOL AG DEPARTMENTone grant, 2023 · $8k
- SHSALMON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +147%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's purpose is to promote san joaquin county and facilitate the creation of jobs within the county through its activities.
The specific purpose for which this corporation is organized are to provide rescue and emergency services beneficial to the public interest, to assist the Kern County Sheriff's Department, Office of Emergency Services of the State of…
The purpose of the san jose fire museum is to acquire, restore, catalogue, preserve and display historic fire apparatus, tools and equipment and memoribilia and to educate the public on the history of the san jose fire department and fire…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
To provide health care for retired k-9 deputies. educate the public in the roll k-9 deputies play in law enforcment
To provide community programs which support law enforcement and crime prevention needs for the community of SalinasTo provide training and equipment for the Police Department of the City of Salinas, California.
The Chico Air Museum was founded to collect, preserve, document and display artifacts significant to the rich aviation and aerospace history of the Chico Army Air Field and the North Valley.
Education of Emergency First Responders.
The Sacramento County Sheriffs Foundation; supports the Sheriffs Office by providing equipment, training, and aid to employees and their families. It focuses on combating drug use and gang activity among young students while bringing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Hospice Inc and the most unlike its peers is University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA ↗
- Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds RIPON QUARTERBACK CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds SAN JOAQUIN JUNIOR SHOW AND AUCTION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds RIPON CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIPON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds COLOR THE SKIES INC ↗
- Who funds SALMON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVERS OF RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds STARS ↗
- Who funds MANTECA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Building Dreams Foundation · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · The Ross E Bewley and Marilyn R Bewley Charitable Foundation Inc · Vaquero Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.