Skip to content
Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$249kHealth$149kAnimals$94kHousing & Shelter$85kYouth Development$49kRecreation & Sports$44kHuman Services$32kFood & Nutrition$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JUNIOR SHOW & AUCTION COUNCIL$10,000
RIPON QUARTERBACK CLUB$7,100
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BETHANY HOME SOCIETY$5,000
RIPON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$2,500
GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE$2,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA$1,500
CA FOUNDATION FOR AG IN THE CLASSROOM$1,000
LOVE RIPON$1,000
GREAT VALLEY BOOKFEST$1,000
WE ARE RIPON$1,000
THE ROTARY CLUB OF ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION$1,000
FRIENDS OF RIPON SCHOOLS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $15k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $15k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $15k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $10k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $10k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $10k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $250 → 15%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $3k → 12%NOT FORGOTTEN: $1k → 12%THOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $500 → 12%Hospice of San Joaquin: $500 → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
WY
CA
TN
NC
SC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$802k · 42 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
38

Total granted

$802k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

31%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +88%
  • GE
    GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +213%
  • VC
    VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CT
    COLOR THE SKIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue ×17
  • RH
    RIPON HIGH SCHOOL AG DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • UF
    UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · 29% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Joaquin Partnership Inc

The organization's purpose is to promote san joaquin county and facilitate the creation of jobs within the county through its activities.

—
2
Kern County Sheriffs Department Search and Rescue-Kern Valley Unit

The specific purpose for which this corporation is organized are to provide rescue and emergency services beneficial to the public interest, to assist the Kern County Sheriff's Department, Office of Emergency Services of the State of…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
San Jose Fire Museum

The purpose of the san jose fire museum is to acquire, restore, catalogue, preserve and display historic fire apparatus, tools and equipment and memoribilia and to educate the public on the history of the san jose fire department and fire…

Arts & Culture
4
San Joaquin County Bar Foundation
Unclassified
5
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Turlock Education Opportunity Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
8
Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs K-9 Association

To provide health care for retired k-9 deputies. educate the public in the roll k-9 deputies play in law enforcment

Crime & Legal
9
Salinas Police Foundation

To provide community programs which support law enforcement and crime prevention needs for the community of SalinasTo provide training and equipment for the Police Department of the City of Salinas, California.

Crime & Legal
10
Chico Air Museum

The Chico Air Museum was founded to collect, preserve, document and display artifacts significant to the rich aviation and aerospace history of the Chico Army Air Field and the North Valley.

Arts & Culture
11
California Fire Chiefs Ems Fire and Education Foundation

Education of Emergency First Responders.

Education
12
Sacramento County Sheriffs Foundation

The Sacramento County Sheriffs Foundation; supports the Sheriffs Office by providing equipment, training, and aid to employees and their families. It focuses on combating drug use and gang activity among young students while bringing…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHANY HOME SOCIETY: $85,000 · OtherBETHANY HOME SOCIETYRCAF: $62,500 · OtherRCAFROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION: $53,700 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATIONSJCOE Educational Foundation: $50,000 · OtherSJCOE Educational FoundationWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherWILD SHEEP FOUNDATIONRIPON HIGH SCHOOL: $30,500 · OtherRIPON HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherCA FOUNDATION FOR AG IN THE CLASSROOM: $21,000 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AG COMMISSIONER: $19,500 · OtherBIG VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $19,350 · Other+56 more: $107,660 · Other+56 moreSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · HealthSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA …VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,250 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S H…COLOR THE SKIES INC: $10,000 · HealthCOLOR THE SKIES INC+3 more: $600 · HealthGIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $82,500 · Human ServicesGIVE EVERY …+4 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA: $29,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentSAN JOAQUIN JUNIOR SHOW AND AUCTION COUNCIL: $15,500 · Recreation & SportsSALMON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsRIVERS OF RECOVERY: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsRIPON CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $13,250 · PhilanthropyRIPON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $11,100 · Community ImprovementWe Are Ripon: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$544,210Health$150,850Human Services$86,000Youth Development$29,500Recreation & Sports$23,500Philanthropy$13,250Community Improvement$12,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetGIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $82,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA: $29,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON QUARTERBACK CLUB INC: $17,100 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN JUNIOR SHOW AND AUCTION COUNCIL: $15,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRIPON CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $13,250 over 4y, 81% of budgetRIPON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $11,100 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCOLOR THE SKIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSALMON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS: $3,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetRIVERS OF RECOVERY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMANTECA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWe Are Ripon: $1,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNot Forgotten Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetColony Oak Parent Faculty Club: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGARDEN JOY: $500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRipon Volunteer Firemans Association: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Joaquin County Historical Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARBUCKLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN OF PEACE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds RIPON QUARTERBACK CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN JUNIOR SHOW AND AUCTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds RIPON CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIPON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds COLOR THE SKIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SALMON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds STARS ↗
  • Who funds RIVERS OF RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds MANTECA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cortopassi Family…Building Dreams Found…Rosi Cerri Foundation…San Joaquin Community…The Antone and Marie …The Ross E Bewley and…Vaquero FoundationSutter Valley Hospita…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
The Cortopassi Family FoundationCA30.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Building Dreams Foundation · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · The Ross E Bewley and Marilyn R Bewley Charitable Foundation Inc · Vaquero Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert & Rina Brocchini Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home