· Private foundation
The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k50 grants · $266k
- $10k–50k108 grants · $2.2M
- $50k–250k2 grants · $259k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lodi Memorial Hospital | $611,000 |
| Memorial Hospital Foundation | $566,260 |
| Sutter Valley Medical Foundation | $427,690 |
| Tracy Communty Hospital Foundation | $383,540 |
| St Josephs Medical Center Foundat | $209,195 |
| Weston Ranch High School | $50,000 |
| Turlock Christian School | $46,569 |
| Gallo Center for the Arts Inc | $43,500 |
| Manteca Fire Chiefs Foundation | $41,030 |
| Give Every Child a Chance | $40,000 |
| Weston Elementary School | $36,500 |
| Family Promise of San Joaquin Count | $35,000 |
| Mercy Spring Ranch | $34,760 |
| Hart-Ransom Academic Charter School | $34,427 |
| Valley Christian Church | $34,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $465k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2023, 26 since wound down; 116 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2023 · $716k · revenue +50%
- SVSUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2023 · $478k · revenue +39%
- GEGIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE5× · 2017–2023 · $147k · revenue +213%
Funded once
- UPUNIDOS POR CRISTO Y MARIAone grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue -18%
- UWUNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $52k · revenue -19%
- BGBoys Girls Club Stanislous Countyone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Sierra Vista Child & Family Services (SVCFS) is a non-profit community based organization providing services for children, youth, adults, and families since 1972 to over 16,000 children and families yearly. The agency provides an extensive…
City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.
Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
The mission of shrp is to provide harm reduction services to people who use drugs and unhoused individuals in san joaquin county.
Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.
Second Chance of Hope, Inc was incorporated in 2018 to assist individuals with increasing self-sufficiency and reducing recidivism rates. SCOH is a private non-profit organization authorized as 501c (3) by the Internal Revenue Service. Our…
Child abuse awareness and prevention
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hatch Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS POR CRISTO Y MARIA ↗
- Who funds MERCY SPRING RANCH ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Read to Me Stockton ↗
- Who funds STOCKTON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS CRISIS CENTER OF STANISLAUS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MANTECA FIRE CHIEFS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREVAIL CA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OPERA MODESTO INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY RECOVERY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN VETERANS FIRST ↗
- Who funds GIVING OPPORTUNITIES TO KIDS ↗
- Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
- Who funds TRACY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stanislaus Community Foundation · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Teichert Foundation · Building Dreams Foundation · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · Mary Stuart Rogers Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · Reed Foundation · The 54 Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.