Skip to content

· Public charity

Alabama Association of Free and Charitable Clinics

The association's mission is to advocate, network and support its clinic members who provide free and charitable medical services to the uninsured and economically vulnerable residents of alabama.

$154k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$11,006
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAHABA VALLEY HEALTH CARE$11,006
M-POWER MINISTRIES$11,006
ETOWAH FREE COMMUNITY CLINIC$11,006
MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES$11,006
ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC$11,006
COMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC$11,006
COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR-MO$11,006
MERCY MEDICAL MINISTRY$11,006
GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES OF TUSCALOO$11,006
LA CLINICA CHRISTIANA INC$11,006
ALABAMA FREE CLINIC$11,006
GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC OF CUL$11,006
THE COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC$11,006
OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY$11,006
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%M-POWER MINISTRIES: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Health Center of Howard County

The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.

Health
2
Good Samaritan Free Clinic Inc

We provide medical services to uninsured and underinsured in our community. This year our mission included assisting the Rescue Mission with healthcare for their residents as well as seeing patients at our clinic.

Health
3
Orangeburg Calhoun Free Medical Clinic Inc

Provide medical care to individuals that are 200% below the poverty level in a primary care setting. this will include examination, treatment and medication. individuals will be screened before being seen to be sure they meet financial…

Health
4
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
5
Hope Clinic Inc

To spread the love of christ to the community by providing quality healthcare and spiritual guidance. the clinic's mission is to provide free medical care and spiritual guidance that minister to the whole person. the clinic will provide…

Human Services
6
Smithville Community Clinic

Free and charitable meadical clinic that provides basic medical services, behavioral health assessments/counseling, well women's check ups, and dental services. opportunities provided for community volunteers and medical professionals.

Health
7
Compassion Outreach Center Inc

Provide free medical and dental care to the uninsured of pontotoc and surrounding counties free medical and dental clinics operated by volunteers multiple nights per month

Health
8
Tutwiler Clinc Inc

The Clinic is a rural health clinic located in Tutwiler, Mississippi. It provides medical, dental, and optometry services to the surrounding area. Ancillary health education and good health practices are promoted.

—
9
Community Care Center for Forsyth County

To provide free on-site medical and dental care to low income families.

Health
10
Leflore County Health Center

To provide healthcare to low income persons

Health
11
Gulf Coast Community Ministries Inc

To alleviate the nutritional, physical and spiritual needs of impoverished people who live on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.

Human Services
12
Refuge Ministries Inc

Operation of medical clinic for uninsured and low-income patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Free Clinic; the most unlike its peers is M-Power Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAHABA VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $11,006 · HealthCAHABA VALLEY HEALTH CARE INCMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $11,006 · HealthMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIESCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INC: $11,006 · HealthCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INCGood Samaritan Health Clinic of Cullman Inc: $11,006 · HealthGood Samaritan Health Clinic of Cullman IncST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $11,006 · HealthST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INCOzanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $11,006 · HealthOzanam Charitable Pharmacy IncCOMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC: $11,006 · HealthCOMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINICTHE COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC: $11,006 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY FREE CLINICALABAMA FREE CLINIC INC: $11,006 · HealthALABAMA FREE CLINIC INCCOMMUNITY CARE INCORPORATED: $11,006 · HealthCOMMUNITY CARE INCORPORATEDGOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY INC: $11,006 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY INCMERCY MEDICAL MINISTRY: $11,006 · HealthMERCY MEDICAL MINISTRYM-POWER Ministries: $11,006 · Human ServicesLA CLINICA CRISTIANA INC: $11,006 · Other
Health$132,072Human Services$11,006Other$11,006

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetM-POWER Ministries: $11,006 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $11,006 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INC: $11,006 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGood Samaritan Health Clinic of Cullman Inc: $11,006 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC: $11,006 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC: $11,006 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY INC: $11,006 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL MINISTRY: $11,006 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · MAP International Inc · Cadence Bank Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alabama Association of Free and Charitable Clinics funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alabama Association of Free and Charitable Clinics. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alabama Association of Free and Charitable Clinics’ filings →

    More from the funding graph