Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cadence Bank Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
376
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$177k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.4MHuman Services$773kHousing & Shelter$503kCommunity Improvement$469kHealth$349kPhilanthropy$304kYouth Development$222kArts & Culture$207kOther$0
02FY2024 · 376 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 376 grants below total $1,747,804 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,006,035 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $258,231 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k347 grants · $816k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $380k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $552k
$2,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Little Rock Christian Academy$176,667
Gordon State College Foundation$100,000
The Woodruff Art Center$75,000
Jackson State University Development Foundation$50,000
University of Mississippi Foundation$50,000
CREATE Foundation$50,000
Regents School of Oxford, Inc.$50,000
Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville$40,000
Mississippi Aquarium Foundation$35,000
Boys and Girls Club of America$29,000
Mid-South Food Bank$25,000
Joy Development School$25,000
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston$20,000
Texas A&M Foundation$20,000
USA Cares Inc.$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $40k → 14%HUTTO HAS HEART: $1k → 6%FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 8%GALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $3k → 14%TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 21%CREDIT COUNSELING OF ARKANSAS: $9k → 14%FOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $4k → 23%HARVEST HOUSE: $1k → 8%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER: $1k → 12%THE ARC OF CLARKE COUNTY INC: $6k → 24%FAYETTE CARES: $3k → 10%RISE: $1k → 15%PROGRAM BELIEVE: $3k → 19%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $1k → 11%HISPANIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 17%M-POWER MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%PETAL CHILDREN'S TASK FORCE: $2k → 22%MISSION TEXARKANA: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN SERVICES MISSION: $2k → 16%VICKSBURG FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SERVICE: $1k → 20%ON THE ROAD LENDING: $3k → 14%LONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER: $4k → 22%CASA OF MADISON COUNTY: $1k → 11%SPRINGFIELD VICTORY MISSION INC: $2k → 15%THE DREAM CENTER: $2k → 15%THE LIGHTHOUSE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 22%PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%OPERATION SHOESTRING: $20k → 23%THE CARE CENTER: $1k → 11%HOUSE OF GRACE: $1k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $50k → 16%FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 11%AREA RELIEF MINISTRIES: $3k → 15%VOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES: $5k → 23%WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST: $9k → 17%SPRINGFIELD VICTORY MISSION INC: $1k → 11%MARSHALL COUNTY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $10k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $1k → 17%OPERATION SHOESTRING: $20k → 23%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $1k → 16%BAKER RIPLEY: $22k → 16%VOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES: $3k → 23%SPRING WOODLANDS MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%GATEWAY: $1k → 16%JEFFERSON CO COMMITTEE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: $2k → 16%ALABAMA ASSET BULDING COALITION: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ID
MN
NY
NJ
CA
MO
VA
NM
AR
TN
SC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 103 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

103 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 273 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
419

Total granted

$1.5M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+17%

Still filing today

91%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO
    2× · 2022–2024 · $177k · revenue +21%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +11%
  • B
    BakerRipley
    2× · 2021–2022 · $72k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • MS
    MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +97%
  • CH
    CHICKASAW HERITAGE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • TS
    TN SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

2
Housing Hub

Building homes working families can afford. We are dedicated to: providing new, affordable homes to residents in the South Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee; preparing future and current homeowners to both acquire and maintain a safe and…

Housing & Shelter
3
Mercy Housing & Human Development

Empowered by the belief that all people have basic rights to dignity and compassion, our mission at mercy housing and human development is to recognize the need for sustainable, affordable housing for low-wealth families of south…

Human Services
4
Habitat for Humanity of Faulkner County

To helpless less fortunate families to build homes

5
Family Promise of Baldwin County

To provide temporary shelter, related services and nuturing support to housing insecure families with children in baldwin county.

Human Services
6
Holston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Holston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

7
United Housing Connections

We connect people at-risk for or experiencing homlessness with safe, sustainable, and affordable homes. we work to promote and preserve the dignity and quality of life for all citizens in upstate south carolina.

Community Improvement
8
Habitat for Humanity of Simpson County Inc

To provide decent affordable housing for families to become homeowners to help them become positive contributors to the community

9
Rebuilding Together Central Alabama

Bringing volunteers and communities together to improve the homes and lives of low-income homeowners.

Community Improvement
10
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
11
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
12
Tunica County Community Development Coalition Inc

Provide training and low income home building for potential first time home buyers. Also provide low income rental housing

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for All Gulf Coast and the most unlike its peers is Community Bank Partners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsYouth Mentoring ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Local History MuseumsAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%16%10–20yr14%31%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr14%25%20–35yr14%34%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%7/629
the rest of the field
16%
1,857/11,871

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

498 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 498 of the 802 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
94
Early backer (in before they grew)
479/498
Grantees still filing
289/498
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Little Rock Christian Academy — $176,667 · OtherLittle Rock Christian AcademyHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHEAST MS — $122,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHEAST MSGordon State College Foundation — $100,000 · OtherCHICKASAW HERITAGE CENTER — $75,000 · OtherTN SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $75,000 · OtherROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $75,000 · Other+112 more — $1,586,643 · Other+112 moreMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $250,000 · EducationMISSOURI STATE UNIVERS…TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO — $177,000 · EducationTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERS…UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSI…URBAN HOPE DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 · EducationURBAN HOPE DEVELOPMENTREGENTS SCHOOL OF OXFORD INC — $50,000 · EducationREGENTS SCHOOL OF OXFO…Avondale House Inc — $50,000 · EducationAvondale House Inc+12 more — $122,510 · Education+12 moreBakerRipley — $71,690 · Human ServicesBakerRipl…COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $50,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …OPERATION SHOESTRING INC — $41,500 · Human ServicesOPERATION…CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'…+21 more — $138,300 · Human Services+21 moreTRUFUND FINANCIAL SERVICES INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementLIFTFUND INC — $40,750 · Community ImprovementCENTRAL DALLAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $24,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC — $18,500 · Community ImprovementCommunity Care Development Network — $17,700 · Community ImprovementTHE CORNERSTONE INITIATIVE — $15,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK RIVER AREA DEVELOPMENT CORP — $10,500 · Community Improvement+6 more — $36,031 · Community ImprovementCREATE FOUNDATION — $95,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Greater Huntsville — $40,000 · PhilanthropyThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston — $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE CAPITAL AREA INC — $13,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Northeast Mississippi Inc — $9,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI — $8,000 · PhilanthropyFamily Foundation of Southwest Louisiana — $7,500 · Philanthropy+5 more — $30,058 · PhilanthropyAQUATIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $145,000 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $32,000 · Housing & ShelterSOLOMON'S TEMPLE FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE INC — $16,000 · Housing & ShelterUSA CARES INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS INC — $11,000 · Housing & ShelterGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSHILOH PLACE MCKINNEY — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterMt Pleasant Community Development Corporation Inc — $5,500 · Housing & ShelterBACK BAY MISSION — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFRANKLIN HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterDEPAUL USA INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFort Cavazos Community Habitat for Humanity Inc — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,210,810Education$799,510Human Services$341,490Community Improvement$232,481Philanthropy$223,058Animals$145,000Housing & Shelter$133,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO — $177,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAQUATIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $145,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCREATE FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBakerRipley — $71,690 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN HOPE DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetREGENTS SCHOOL OF OXFORD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAvondale House Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRUFUND FINANCIAL SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $44,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SHOESTRING INC — $41,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetLIFTFUND INC — $40,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S FUND INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Greater Huntsville — $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $32,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMISSISSIPPI MUSEUM OF ART INC — $27,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJoy Development School — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL DALLAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $24,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HEALTH SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetArea Development Partnership Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC — $18,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Care Development Network — $17,700 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSOLOMON'S TEMPLE FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF NORTH MS — $15,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA CARES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEL DORADO FESTIVALS & EVENTS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORNERSTONE INITIATIVE — $15,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CAPITAL AREA INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKIDSGYM USA INC — $12,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetRandy Sams Outreach Shelter — $12,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK RIVER AREA DEVELOPMENT CORP — $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY CHRISTIAN SERVICESINC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPositive Atmosphere Reaches Kids Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFORREST GENERAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BBVA FoundationAL44.7× affinity29 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BBVA Foundation · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Regions Foundation · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · Ergon Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mid South · Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Entergy Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cadence Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Tri-County Community Council Inc33% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc2% of income from government
  • Harvest House Inc0% of income from government
  • Bay Education Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
65report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cadence Bank Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cadence Bank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 802 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph