Skip to content
Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$282k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$552kFood & Nutrition$398kHousing & Shelter$274kReligion$152kEducation$67kPhilanthropy$61kEmployment$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $276k
$11,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS FOR THE AGING$11,500
Individual grant recipient$11,500
INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER$11,500
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC$11,500
MARTHA'S TABLE$11,500
HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON$11,500
AT HOME IN ALEXANDRIA$11,500
CULPEPPER GARDEN- ARLINGTON$11,500
MANNA FOOD CENTER INC$11,500
MARY'S CENTER$11,500
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING$11,500
GREATER DC DIAPER BANK$11,500
SHARE OUR STRENGTH - NO KID HUNGRY$11,500
NORTHERN VA FAMILY SERVICES$11,500
BIRMINGHAM GREEN FOUNDATION$11,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $728k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%THE FENWICK FOUNDATION: $14k → 7%NEIGHBOR RIDE: $11k → 6%HOMESTRETCH INC: $12k → 4%THE FENWICK FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%HOSPICE CARING INC: $13k → 8%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $12k → 4%THE FENWICK FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%HOSPICE CARING INC: $13k → 8%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $11k → 11%SHEPHERD CENTER OF OAKTON VIENN: $13k → 6%THE FENWICK FOUNDATION: $11k → 7%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME: $13k → 14%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $11k → 4%SHEPHERD CENTER OF OAKTON VIENN: $13k → 6%HOSPICE CARING INC: $11k → 8%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $11k → 14%ALTERNATIVE HOUSE: $13k → 6%SENIOR CONNECTION OF MONTGOMERY: $12k → 8%CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE: $13k → 14%MAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $13k → 6%BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $14k → 8%MAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $13k → 6%ALTERNATIVE HOUSE: $13k → 7%GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $14k → 9%GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING: $12k → 8%SEABURY RESOURCES FOR AGING: $25k → 14%GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%GOODWIN LIVING FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%BOYS TOWN WASHINGTON DC INC: $13k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING: $12k → 8%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $14k → 14%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $14k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $14k → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $13k → 8%SEABURY RESOURCES FOR AGING: $14k → 14%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $13k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $13k → 8%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $13k → 14%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $13k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $13k → 6%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $13k → 14%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $11k → 6%THE ARMY DISTAFF FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 14%THE ARMY DISTAFF FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $12k → 14%BROOKLAND SENIOR DAYCARE CENTER: $12k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 61 repeat orgs$506k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
37

Total granted

$2.3M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+5%

Still filing today

75%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SENIOR SERVICES OF ALEXANDRIA
    5× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +71%
  • IM
    INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +68%
  • HH
    HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • AA
    ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -18%
  • IV
    INOVA VNA HOME HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
2
Friendship Place

Friendship Place is a leader in the Washington, DC, metro area in developing solutions to homelessness that have measurable results and a lasting impact. Friendship Place's mission is to empower people who are experiencing or at risk of…

Housing & Shelter
3
Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc

Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Nourishing Bethesda Inc

Fighting food insecurity in our area by providing nutritious food and community support to our neighbors in need, as well as offering and linking our clients to wraparound resources that will enable them to build healthy and stable lives.

Human Services
5
Circle Center Adult Day Services

Day services for functionally or cognitively impaired older adults andtheir caregivers, and to advance community-based long-term care options for older adults.

Human Services
6
Everyone Home Dc

We support the holistic needs of individuals and families at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Housing is our starting point. Seeing people thrive is our finish line.

Human Services
7
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
8
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
9
Chinese Culture and Community Service Center Inc

Provide cultural, social, sports, and educational services and serve functionally and/or cognitively impaired adults with a variety of health, social and other related services.

Arts & Culture
10
Good Shepherd Housing & Family Services Inc

To reduce homelessness, increase the support from the community and promote self-sufficiency for families and individuals struggling with housing issues in Fairfax County, Virginia.

Housing & Shelter
11
Woodley House Inc

Woodley house enables district of columbia residents with mental health disorders to live full and healthy lives with dignity by providing supportive housing and services.

Health
12
Martha Jefferson House

Martha Jefferson House strives to provide a living environment where its residents can continue to mature and flourish on their life's journey. We are dedicated to honoring their contributions to our society by bestowing upon them respect,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Reach of Montgomery County; the most unlike its peers is The Washington Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/67
Grantees still filing
54/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SENIOR SERVICES OF ALEXANDRIA: $65,250 · OtherTHE CHILD & FAMILY NETWORK: $64,250 · OtherCULPEPPER GARDEN- ARLINGTON: $61,700 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF: $61,200 · OtherTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $48,500 · OtherSOME INC: $48,500 · OtherNORTHERN VA FAMILY SVC: $48,200 · OtherDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $48,200 · OtherHERNDON VILLAGE NETWORK: $45,250 · Other+44 more: $836,950 · Other+44 moreGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $62,500 · Human ServicesGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATIONIona Senior Services: $51,250 · Human ServicesIona Senior ServicesFENWICK FOUNDATION: $51,000 · Human ServicesFENWICK FOUNDATIONCARINGMATTERS INC: $48,200 · Human ServicesCARINGMATTERS INCMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $40,250 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INCSeabury Resources for Aging: $39,500 · Human ServicesSeabury Resources for AgingJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $38,250 · Human ServicesCapital Hospice: $37,200 · Human ServicesMAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $37,000 · Human ServicesCAPITOL HILL VILLAGE: $27,000 · Human ServicesThe Shepherd's Center of Northern Virginia: $26,000 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARMY DISTAFF FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · Human Services+15 more: $218,000 · Human Services+15 moreCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $62,750 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA…NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 · Food & NutritionNOURISH NOW …MANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $48,500 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD C…BREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $36,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR TH…MARTHA'S TABLE INC: $35,500 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TAB…FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS: $30,250 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR NEI…Arlington Food Assistance Center: $24,500 · Food & NutritionArlington Fo…Good News Community Kitchen: $12,000 · Food & NutritionINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $64,500 · HealthINSIGHT MEM…HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $63,500 · HealthHEBREW HOME…HOME CARE PARTNERS INC: $49,000 · HealthHOME CARE P…FOOD & FRIENDS INC: $36,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIE…At Home in Alexandria: $35,500 · HealthAt Home in …JOSEPH'S HOUSE INC: $26,000 · HealthJOSEPH'S HO…The Washington Home Inc: $12,000 · HealthParkinson Foundation of the National Capital Area: $11,000 · HealthShelter House Inc: $37,000 · Housing & ShelterCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $24,200 · Housing & ShelterPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC: $26,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $23,000 · PhilanthropyBirmingham Green Foundation: $11,500 · PhilanthropyARTS FOR THE AGING INC: $35,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,328,000Human Services$728,150Food & Nutrition$312,000Health$297,500Housing & Shelter$61,200Philanthropy$60,500Arts & Culture$35,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF ALEXANDRIA: $65,250 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $64,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $63,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $62,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetIona Senior Services: $51,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFENWICK FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetHOME CARE PARTNERS INC: $49,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $48,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $48,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOME INC: $48,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $48,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCARINGMATTERS INC: $48,200 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $40,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALVERT HOSPICE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSeabury Resources for Aging: $39,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $38,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCapital Hospice: $37,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $37,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBRITEPATHS INC: $37,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetShelter House Inc: $37,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAt Home in Alexandria: $35,500 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetARTS FOR THE AGING INC: $35,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $35,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR NEIGHBORS: $30,250 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetFALLS CHURCH-MCLEAN CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $30,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCAPITOL HILL VILLAGE: $27,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJOSEPH'S HOUSE INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARMY DISTAFF FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center: $24,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $24,200 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetArlington Pediatric Center Inc: $24,200 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $23,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTION PROGRAM: $22,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $18,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN: $14,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $13,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLittle Lights Urban Ministries Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Washington Home Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF ALEXANDRIA ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
  • Who funds FENWICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOME CARE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds DOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CARINGMATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CALVERT HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Seabury Resources for Aging ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds Capital Hospice ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRITEPATHS INC ↗
  • Who funds Shelter House Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds At Home in Alexandria ↗
  • Who funds ARTS FOR THE AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds FALLS CHURCH-MCLEAN CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Philip L Graham Fund …Clark-Winchcole Found…Greater Washington Co…United Way of the Nat…John Edward Fowler Me…The Community Foundat…The Morris and Gwendo…Cloudbreak Foundation…Dimick Foundation Joh…Lillian R Wardman Irr…Mars Hq Regional Foun…Van Metre Companies F…
Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings CompanyVA52.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Cloudbreak Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Lillian R Wardman Irr Tr · Mars Hq Regional Foundation · Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Partners in Care Maryland Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc: 17% of income from government
  • Arts for the Aging Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Bender Jcc of Greater Washington: 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Capital Hospice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ada L and Albert M Wibel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home