Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA (Washington) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,828,415 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($664,237). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$6.2M
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
$12M
8/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%
01What it does

What Young Womens Christian Assoc of Yakima does

Mission

The young womens christian association of yakima is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Alternatives to domestic violence program provides confidential safe shelter, counseling, referral, and legal advocacy to women and children struggling to break the cycle of abuse. The emergency shelter includes 15 units (44 beds) that are subsidized with state and federal funds.

    $1,597,482 spent$221,802 earned by the program
    81% of program spending
  2. The transitional housing program provides temporary housing for women and their families while they rebuild self-sufficiency in a safe and nurturing environment. The ywca transitional housing units include 16 affordable studio, 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units that are subsidized with state and federal funds. This program also includes supportive services and education that help families achieve stability as they move from emergency shelters towards permanent housing and independent living.

    $365,937 spent$358 earned by the program
    19% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,963,419.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($1.8M) Expenses 100 ($1.8M) Net assets 100 ($7.8M)2019 Revenue 78 ($1.4M) Expenses 97 ($1.7M) Net assets 96 ($7.5M)2020 Revenue 68 ($1.3M) Expenses 90 ($1.6M) Net assets 92 ($7.2M)2021 Revenue 93 ($1.7M) Expenses 91 ($1.6M) Net assets 95 ($7.4M)2022 Revenue 98 ($1.8M) Expenses 104 ($1.8M) Net assets 93 ($7.3M)2023 Revenue 101 ($1.9M) Expenses 114 ($2.0M) Net assets 95 ($7.4M)2024 Revenue 203 ($3.7M) Expenses 121 ($2.1M) Net assets 117 ($9.1M)2025 Revenue 333 ($6.2M) Expenses 129 ($2.3M) Net assets 159 ($12M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (333)Expenses (129)Net assets (159)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $9.3M to $14M (+54%).

$7.9M
$7.6M
$7.4M
$7.9M
$7.5M
$7.5M
$9.3M
$14M
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 34% · 2019 40% · 2020 46% · 2021 38% · 2022 43% · 2023 43% · 2024 26% · 2025 59%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$78k
’18
−$281k
’19
−$329k
’20
$107k
’21
−$26k
’22
−$159k
’23
$1.6M
’24
$3.9M
’25
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Cheri Kilty

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2423252525241920
Joined·+5+8+14+0+6+4+3
No longer listed·66140792
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 6 funders, grant income fell $159k → $100k.

9 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 71% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 36% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA.

36%
largest funder
66%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 65% · 2018 65% · 2019 65% · 2020 63% · 2021 56% · 2022 32% · 2023 75% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

71% of YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $524k that is directly attributable, 96% of it comes from Washington funders.

WA
IL
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 11%Fundraising 2%

Governance

24
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA?
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA (Washington) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,828,415 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($664,237). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $1,828,415 in grants to YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA?
YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $664,237 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF YAKIMA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Young Womens Christian Assoc of Yakima →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing