Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE

WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE (Washington) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $664,725 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($124,526). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$826k
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$665k
Net assets
$1.1M
12/21 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What Wolf Hollow Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre does

Mission

To promote the well-being of wildlife and their habitats through rehabilitation of injured and orphaned wildlife, public education and non-invasive research.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Wolf Hollow Wildlife Rehabilitation Center took in 298 wild animals during the year representing 91 species. Animals form 17 locations including multiple islands and the mainland in the Pacific Northwest. Ninety Seven, 97, animals were released with an uncorrected rate of 35.4%, a return to rehabilitation standards. Numbers were lower due to the center taking an intake pause October-December due to staffing changes at the center. In 2024, Wolf Hollow Wildlife Rehabilitation Center treated 4 Harbor Seals and released 3, one was humanly euthanized as it was determined it would not survive its injuries. All Harbor Seal Pups were from the San Juan County Marine Mammal Stranding network. The center has been receiving less pups since SR3 opened in Seattle in 2021. The rabbit population had a virus this year, but as the rabbits on San Juan Island are ferial domestics, none came in for care.

    $314,248 spentof which $1,494 as grants$284,342 earned by the program
    73% of program spending
  2. Educational activities were back in full strength in 2024. We participated in 83 events and engaged with 2,869 people. Some activities included weekly talks at national, state, and county parks, the local summer camps, and several special events. The largest event was four days at the San Juan County Fair where we interacted with 598 attendees. The majority of the educational activities take place in the summer months, but due to the centers pause, there were no educational events October-December. The Summer Internship program where interns come for two months of hands-on training was back to full strength. Eight rehabilitation interns, one educational intern were in attendance over the busy summer months. Madrona, our last educational ambassador, retired from service in March 2024. She was showing signs of arthritis which caused her pain. It was time to let her relax and enjoy her golden years.

    $119,152 spent$83,309 earned by the program
    27% of program spending
  3. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $433,400.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($314k) Expenses 100 ($281k) Net assets 100 ($398k)2018 Revenue 69 ($217k) Expenses 92 ($257k) Net assets 90 ($358k)2019 Revenue 91 ($287k) Expenses 107 ($301k) Net assets 121 ($480k)2020 Revenue 114 ($359k) Expenses 108 ($302k) Net assets 115 ($457k)2021 Revenue 124 ($388k) Expenses 133 ($373k) Net assets 104 ($412k)2022 Revenue 198 ($622k) Expenses 136 ($383k) Net assets 174 ($692k)2023 Revenue 181 ($569k) Expenses 161 ($451k) Net assets 204 ($810k)2024 Revenue 263 ($826k) Expenses 205 ($575k) Net assets 270 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (263)Expenses (205)Net assets (270)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $417k to $703k (+68%).

$403k
$402k
$542k
$461k
$417k
$703k
$852k
$1.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 2% · 2018 11% · 2019 17% · 2020 12% · 2021 9% · 2022 5% · 2023 8% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$33k
’17
−$40k
’18
−$14k
’19
$57k
’20
$15k
’21
$239k
’22
$118k
’23
$251k
’24
19
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Marcy Brown

Board President

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed66877667
Joined·+0+3+0+0+0+0+1
No longer listed·0110100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $31k → $92k.

10 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 75% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE.

19%
largest funder
52%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 38% · 2018 29% · 2019 39% · 2020 31% · 2021 23% · 2022 32% · 2023 28% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

69% of WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

75% of WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $166k that is directly attributable, 52% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 5 states.

WA
NJ
CA
DE
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $499k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,435 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin30% · top quartile
Months of reserve18.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)15% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,435 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $86k on record.

Federal$86k
grants $86kcontracts $0
18
21
Top agencies
  • Department of Commerce$86k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 16%Fundraising 9%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

67%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE?
WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE (Washington) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $664,725 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($124,526). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $664,725 in grants to WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $124,526 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Wolf Hollow Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing