· Private foundation
Wildlife Support Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| Oregon State University Foundation | $60,000 |
| ROWENA WILDLIFE CLINIC | $10,000 |
| SNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC | $10,000 |
| WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENT | $10,000 |
| BADGER RUN WILDLIFE REHAB | $10,000 |
| CHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER | $10,000 |
| WEST SOUND WILDLIFE SHELTER | $7,000 |
| WHATCOM HUMANE SOCIETY | $7,000 |
| Guide Dogs of America | $2,000 |
| SAVING GRACE INC | $1,000 |
| OLDDOG HAVEN | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Oregon State University Foundation7× · 2019–2025 · $390k · revenue +38%- SWSARVEY WILDLIFE CARE CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $222k · revenue +147%
CHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +172%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rescue & Rehab orphaned and injured wild
To support native wildlife, population research, and environmental education through several specific aims: Provide rehabilitation and high quality medical care to individual animals adversely impacted by human development and changing…
Wildlife rehabilitation
Wildlife rehabilitation in Central Florida
Wildlife rehabitation
To rescue orphaned and injured wildlife
Licensed organization dedicated to caring for injured, orphaned, sick and displaced wildlife for the purpose of releasing them back into the wild.
Our organizations main purpose is the rehabilitation of injured/orphaned wildlife.
To provide a safe haven for injured and orphaned wildlife, provide rehabilitation and release, when possible, and to foster public awareness and appreciation of wildlife.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Wildlife Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Oregon State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SARVEY WILDLIFE CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROWENA WILDLIFE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CASCADES RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds Blue Mountain Wildlife ↗
- Who funds West Sound Wildlife Shelter ↗
- Who funds BADGER RUN WILDLIFE REHAB ↗
- Who funds IDAHO BLACK BEAR REHAB INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds WOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds TURTLE RIDGE WILD LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds American Heritage Wildlife Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Kinsman Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wildlife Support Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.