· Public charity
Rural India Supporting Trust
To improve quality of life for the citizens of india by providing grants that advance public health, economic opportunity, and education in india.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $7,856,877 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $21,861,082 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,004,205 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $227k
- $250k+11 grants · $7.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION | $1,311,290 |
| citiesRISE | $1,000,000 |
| THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $985,985 |
| KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES INTERNATIONAL | $882,466 |
| Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) | $725,720 |
| AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC | $655,270 |
| Resolve to Save Lives | $649,322 |
| AROGYA WORLD | $477,290 |
| Wheels Global Foundation | $372,876 |
| The Nature Conservancy | $276,547 |
| India Philanthropy Alliance Association | $275,000 |
| Center for Strategic and International Studies | $164,085 |
| CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC (CRY AMERICA) | $63,026 |
| The New England Center for Children | $18,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $14M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Economic Opportunity · Public Health
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KHKEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES INTERNATIONAL8× · 2017–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +205% · 98% of their budget
- TATHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +188%
- TGTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC6× · 2018–2023 · $5.0M · revenue +14%
Funded once
- THTHE HANS FOUNDATION USAone grant, 2021 · $1.7M · revenue -100%
- PFPartnerships For Changegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue +336%
- AAACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $287k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
Orbis builds strong and sustainable eye care systems globally that put treatment and prevention within reach
Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citiesrise Inc and the most unlike its peers is Youth Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds THE HANS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
- Who funds CITIESRISE INC ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds RESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA PHILANTHROPY ALLIANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Partnerships For Change ↗
- Who funds CRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds INDIASPORA ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds VIBHA INC AKA HELP THEM GROW ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THRESH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rural India Supporting Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The New England Center for Children Inc — 3% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rural India Supporting Trust?
Find your warmest path to Rural India Supporting Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.