Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

WEBER PATHWAYS

WEBER PATHWAYS (Utah) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $964,272 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($333,500). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$514k
Funders on record
27
Grants received
$964k
Net assets
$5.6M
15/27 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 34%
01What it does

What Weber Pathways does

Mission

The mission of trails foundation of northern utah is to plan, promote, construct, maintain, and protect a network of public pathways, trails, and related open spaces for non-motorized users throughout northern utah.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Trails foundation northern utah is a local non-profit whose mission is to plan, promote, preserve, protect, construct, and maintain a network of public pathways, trails and related open spaces for non-motorized users throughout northern utah. In 2022, through the help of individual donors, cfov, memberships and grants, tfnu was able to support a full-time trail crew for 18 weeks throughout the summer trail season. This small, but mighty crew, hosted 13 community volunteer nights, maintained, and built over 12 miles of trails inside the north fork park in eden, along with portions of the bonneville shoreline trail, the weber river parkway, upper wheelers and green pond trails, powder mountain & the sidewinder trail located within the bridges community / wolf creek resort. New trails completed include the longer loop, giddy up and spork trails in north fork park. Phase 2 of our massive blackner's bend construction project along the weber river parkway was completed this year. It included both trail building and work to improve the function of the weber river. Two-thirds of a mile of pathway were completed to a 10-foot width and finished with crushed rock that will provide a firm,…

    $326,323 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. Weber Pathways was organized in 1995 to construct and preserve pathways in weber county, utah for the use and enjoyment of the general public. The organization also promotes public education through pathway user groups, the public media, and school systems to enhance public awareness of the environment, natural resources, and pathways.

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $326,323.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($630k) Expenses 100 ($471k) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 132 ($830k) Expenses 164 ($770k) Net assets 105 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 139 ($875k) Expenses 169 ($794k) Net assets 113 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 177 ($1.1M) Expenses 166 ($783k) Net assets 143 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 143 ($902k) Expenses 117 ($553k) Net assets 172 ($1.9M)2022 Revenue 141 ($886k) Expenses 233 ($1.1M) Net assets 153 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 718 ($4.5M) Expenses 145 ($681k) Net assets 499 ($5.5M)2024 Revenue 82 ($514k) Expenses 107 ($504k) Net assets 500 ($5.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (82)Expenses (107)Net assets (500)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.7M to $5.6M (+221%).

$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.4M
$1.6M
$2.0M
$1.7M
$5.6M
$5.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 43% · 2018 53% · 2019 58% · 2020 27% · 2021 44% · 2022 53% · 2023 5% · 2024 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

90% of WEBER PATHWAYS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,984 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$159k
’17
$60k
’18
$81k
’19
$331k
’20
$349k
’21
−$211k
’22
$3.8M
’23
$10k
’24
17
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Mark Bunker

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2018212318131329
Joined·+1+6+6+0+5+4+16
No longer listed·33451040
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 6 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $17k → $76k.

6 of 27 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WEBER PATHWAYS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WEBER PATHWAYS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 35% of grant income and the top three 67%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

54% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WEBER PATHWAYS.

35%
largest funder
67%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 79% · 2019 25% · 2020 41% · 2021 82% · 2022 83% · 2023 83% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

10% of WEBER PATHWAYS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

80% of WEBER PATHWAYS's grant income comes from Utah funders.

MN
OR
NV
CT
UT
MO
VA
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $416k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WEBER PATHWAYS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,800 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve16.9mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,800 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding WEBER PATHWAYS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $11k on record.

Federal$11k
grants $11kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$11k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WEBER PATHWAYS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

65% of spending goes to programs.

Program 65%Management 27%Fundraising 8%

Governance

28
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WEBER PATHWAYS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WEBER PATHWAYS?
WEBER PATHWAYS (Utah) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $964,272 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($333,500). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WEBER PATHWAYS have?
IRS filings report 27 organizations giving $964,272 in grants to WEBER PATHWAYS, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WEBER PATHWAYS?
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $333,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WEBER PATHWAYS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Weber Pathways →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 27 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing