Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION

WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION (Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,841 to it, the largest being Thoresen Foundation ($90,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$174k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$124k
Net assets
$68k
0/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 12%
01What it does

What Wildlife Restoration Foundation does

Mission

Wildlife Restoration Foundation is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization based in virginia with the mission to support partners that together can increase park wildlife population viability and create safe corridors for wildlife passage in harmony with human communities. Wrf assembles and supports, with neutral facilitation and written resources, partnerships between aza-accredited zoos/aquariums and parks. Wrf also convenes diverse stakeholders in workshops that help solve conservation problems.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. North american bison summit: the north american bison summit (nabs) coordinates a cross-border, multi-sectoral initiative bringing together conservationists, tribes, first nations, and family ranchers across canada, mexico, and the united states. The program's mission is to conserve north america's bison populations, restore vital grassland ecosystems, and protect traditional ranching livelihoods from development pressures. Through collaborative networking, nabs develops shared models and tools to advance whole-herd health, genetic variability, and disease mitigation. Additionally, the summit actively supports tribal food sovereignty and buffalo culture revitalization, while promoting the ecological and climate-resilience benefits of managed grazers.

    $102,307 spentof which $6,561 as grants
    56% of program spending
  2. Imofolozi project: the defending a south african wilderness from wildlife crime project, or "the imfolozi project," is a collaborative initiative led by the Wildlife Restoration Foundation (wrf) and the wilderness leadership school (wls) to protect wildlife in hluhluwe-imfolozi provincial park (hip) in south africa and yellowstone national park (ynp) in the us. The project aims to combat sophisticated poaching threats in these iconic parks, which are home to critical populations of endangered species.hip, located in kwazulu-natal province, harbors about half of south africa's wild rhinos (1,500-1,800), while ynp is crucial for conserving bison, grizzly bears, and wolves. However, provincial parks' capacity to fight poaching has diminished due to budget constraints, staff reductions, and pandemic-related challenges. The project leverages wls guides' advanced outdoor skills to supplement anti-poaching efforts. These guides have transitioned into anti-poaching unit assistants, enhancing the effectiveness of ezemvelo kzn wildlife (ekznw) anti-poaching units (apus). Wls has also established rhino and bio-monitoring patrols (rbmps) and community trails to improve surveillance and engage…

    $40,608 spentof which $39,920 as grants
    22% of program spending
  3. I am bear safe: iabs is a uniquely effective methodology gaining the buy-in and trust of small businesses in the gateway communities of yellowstone and glacier national parks to deliver bear safety instruction to tourists and local recreationists at key points of intervention. Compelling customizable tools convey a town signature stewardship effort that is recognizable across 14 park gateways through the participation of 420 businesses and vacation rentals, 14 chambers, 4-5 airports, 3 zoos, 2 tribes, and 2 national parks. Through a "bear quiz" reinforcing signage messaging, anyone can become a park bear steward.

    $23,493 spent
    13% of program spending
  4. Park experience program: the park experience program, also known as the "yellowstone experience" is a growing resource opportunity for our organization. This experience is a repeatable methodology and educational opportunity to take a group of passionate and interested donors on an exclusive tour of yellowstone and the surrounding towns and natural and cultural experiences. All accommodations are provided, as well as transportation and unique dining and wildlife viewing. Wrf's project and conservation missions are highlighted as a part of the wildlife excursions, so our donors are able to see our work in action!

    $10,996 spent
    6% of program spending
  5. Zoo-park partnership for america's keystone wildlife: wrf's zpps have demonstrated measurable outcomes, including increased survival rates for endangered species, enhanced genetic monitoring, reduced disease transmission, and improved human-wildlife coexistence. The partnerships not only benefit wildlife populations within parks but also extend conservation messaging and stewardship opportunities to millions of zoo visitors annually.

    $3,867 spent
    2% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $181,271.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($113k) Expenses 100 ($64k) Net assets 100 ($51k)2024 Revenue 194 ($220k) Expenses 215 ($138k) Net assets 269 ($137k)2025 Revenue 154 ($174k) Expenses 380 ($244k) Net assets 133 ($68k)
202320242025
Revenue (154)Expenses (380)Net assets (133)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $56k to $142k (+154%).

$56k
$142k
$73k
202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

45% of WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,065 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$49k
’23
$82k
’24
−$69k
’25
12
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Sally Mulvena Jacobsen

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

20242025
Listed1110
Joined·+0
No longer listed·1
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $7k → $14k.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

27% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION.

73%
largest funder
94%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 3 states in all.

DC
GA
TX

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $14k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 3,954 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−40% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)24% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,954 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $60k on record.

Federal$60k
grants $60kcontracts $0
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$60k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 6 states

WA
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION?
WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION (Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,841 to it, the largest being Thoresen Foundation ($90,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $123,841 in grants to WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION.
Who is the largest funder of WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION?
Thoresen Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $90,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Wildlife Restoration →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing