· Community foundation
Women Giving as One Inc
To drive participation among women in local philanthropy, raise awareness of the unmet needs of nonprofit organizations in the sonoma valley, inspire donors to become more involved with local charities, and make a substantial impact on the long-term sustainability of our nonprofits, all towards building a just and thriving sonoma valley.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VINTAGE HOUSE | $25,000 |
| KID SCOOP NEWS | $25,000 |
| SONOMA IMMIGRANT SERVICES | $25,000 |
| SONOMA OVERNIGHT SUPPORT | $25,000 |
| CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SONOMA VALLEY | $25,000 |
| NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER | $25,000 |
| SONOMA COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS FDN | $25,000 |
| VIVO YOUTH ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| SONOMA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ART ESCAPE | $25,000 |
| LA LUZ CENTER | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY MATTERS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $779k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +118% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLLA LUZ CENTER5× · 2017–2022 · $173k · revenue +30%
- VHVintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center6× · 2018–2024 · $158k · revenue +118%
- SLSONOMA LAND TRUST2× · 2017–2020 · $113k · revenue +334%
Funded once
- SVSONOMA VLY COMMUNITY HEALTHone grant, 2019 · $100k
- FFFOOD FOR ALLone grant, 2023 · $25k
- CSChallenge Sonoma Adventure Ropes Course Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +178%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Address the homeless crisis in California.
Sonoma County Conservation Action's mission is to better our quality of life in Sonoma County for all generations, through educating and directly engaging the public on local environmental issues and policies using grassroots organizing.
preschool and after-care for children ages 2-5.
Sonoma Valley Health and recreation Association (Sonoma Splash) is dedicated to providing a sustainable state of the art multi-use aquatic and recreation facility accessible to all Sonoma Valley residents for aquatic education and safety,…
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
The Mission of the Symons Family Fund is to benefit, perform the functions of, and carry out the purposes of the Sonora Area Foundation that engage in charitable activities which benefit the residents of Tuolumne County, California.
To Educate Through Nature
The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sonoma Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Flowery Elementary School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA LUZ CENTER ↗
- Who funds Vintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center ↗
- Who funds Sonoma Valley Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds SONOMA LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SONOMA OVERNIGHT SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds Sonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds KID SCOOP NEWS ↗
- Who funds VIVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds INDIVIDUALS NOW INC DBA SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Sonoma Ecology Center ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA VALLEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SONOMA VALLEY TEEN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Friends In Sonoma Helping Inc ↗
- Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT SONOMA ↗
- Who funds Sebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ARTESCAPE ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MATTERS ↗
- Who funds Becoming Independent ↗
- Who funds NORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SQUARE PEG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sonoma Immigrant Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Sonoma County Regional Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds Challenge Sonoma Adventure Ropes Course Inc ↗
- Who funds Homeless Action Sonoma Inc ↗
- Who funds Career Technical Education Foundation Sonoma County ↗
- Who funds Flowery Elementary School PTO ↗
- Who funds LIFEWORKS OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NORTH COAST RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JUST1MIKE ↗
- Who funds SWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Vadasz Family Foundation · Simon Blattner Family Foundation · Sonoma Valley Vintners & Growers Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Khr McNeely Family Foundation · Manitou Fund · Speedway Children's Charities · Exchange Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women Giving as One Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.