Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

John Christopher Bunting Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$280kFood & Nutrition$147kEducation$119kHuman Services$112kArts & Culture$69kPublic Benefit$55kCommunity Improvement$55kYouth Development$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$694k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF OAKLEY LIBRARY$10,000
SONOMA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
HANNA CENTER$6,000
SAN DAMENICO SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$5,000
SEBASTIANI THEATRE FOUNDATION$3,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY$2,500
SONOMA COUNTY VINTNERS FOUNDATION$2,500
YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY$2,000
THE ROTARY CLUB OF SONOMA VALLEY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $16k → 8%VINTAGE HOUSE: $10k → 8%VINTAGE HOUSE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NV
CA
MD
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of John Christopher Bunting Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

John Christopher Bunting Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$571k · 23 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
42

Total granted

$571k
$402k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+19%

Still filing today

65%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    Sonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance
    3× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +213%
  • SV
    SONOMA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +51%
  • SC
    SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $22k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SV
    SONOMA VALLEY VINTNERS & GROWERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $147k · revenue -90%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +19%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +141%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
2
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
3
The Stanford Theatre Foundation
—
4
Sonoma Valley Film Festival

Sonoma valley film society produces the annual international film festival

Arts & Culture
5
Symons Family Fund

The Mission of the Symons Family Fund is to benefit, perform the functions of, and carry out the purposes of the Sonora Area Foundation that engage in charitable activities which benefit the residents of Tuolumne County, California.

Human Services
6
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
8
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
9
Friends of the Sonoma Library
—
10
Sonora Area Foundation

Strengthens its community through assisting donors, making grants, and providing leadership.

Philanthropy
11
California Film Institute

The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…

Arts & Culture
12
Sonoma Land Trust

Protect the scenic, natural, cultural, agricultural and open landscapes of sonoma county for the benefit of the community and future generations by developing long-term land protection strategies; (continued on schedule o) promoting…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Napa Valley Festival Association and the most unlike its peers is Common Goal Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionProfessional Ballet Compani…Native Hawaiian Community D…Developmental Disabilities …Independent K-8 SchoolsLand Conservation Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Senior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%9%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%3%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr11%38%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/50
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,928

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
24/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SONOMA VALLEY VINTNERS & GROWERS FOUNDATION — $147,330 · OtherSONOMA VALLEY VINTNERS & GROWERS FOUNDATIONNORTH BAY LEARNING FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherNORTH BAY LEARNING FOUNDATIONTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES (TFAS) — $25,000 · OtherYWCA — $22,500 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $20,000 · OtherPacific Legal Foundation — $17,500 · Other+38 more — $188,466 · Other+38 moreSONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $210,000 · HealthSONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FO…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthCENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION — $35,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR…SONOMA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $25,000 · Arts & CultureSONOMA VAL…THE ATLAS SOCIETY LTD — $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ATLAS …Sebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc — $7,000 · Arts & CultureSebastiani…NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $4,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $25,000 · Human ServicesSONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER — $21,900 · Human ServicesVintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance — $40,000 · EducationThe George Washington University — $10,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationGOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · EducationHIPPO LIFE — $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORING ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY INC — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentCURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $35,000 · International
Other$480,796Health$219,500Arts & Culture$87,500Human Services$68,400Education$62,000Youth Development$38,000International$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $210,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY VINTNERS & GROWERS FOUNDATION — $147,330 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance — $40,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION — $35,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $25,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER — $21,900 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center — $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ATLAS SOCIETY LTD — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIPPO LIFE — $14,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetVALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION — $12,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN'S TOUCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetThe George Washington University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION 36 INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKA'OHANA O KALAUPAPA — $7,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS OF SAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI — $2,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetGiant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMarin History Museum — $1,935 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPets Lifeline Inc — $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRITTER CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGiant Steps Illinois Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DOMENICO SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA CONSERVATORY OF DANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmargosa Land Trust — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…Marin Community Found…McNabb FoundationSimon Blattner Family…The Vadasz Family Fou…Sanderson Family Foun…Sonoma Valley Vintner…Khr McNeely Family Fo…Clay Foundation - WestKakatu Foundation IncWomen Giving as One I…The Scott Family Fund
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA35.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Simon Blattner Family Foundation · The Vadasz Family Foundation · Sanderson Family Foundation · Sonoma Valley Vintners & Growers Foundation · Khr McNeely Family Foundation · Clay Foundation - West · Kakatu Foundation Inc · Women Giving as One Inc · The Scott Family Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John Christopher Bunting Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Christopher Bunting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John Christopher Bunting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines