Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

United Mission For Relief & Development

United Mission For Relief & Development (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 55 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,937,139 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($647,938). 23 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 69% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$150M
Funders on record
55
Grants received
$2.9M
Net assets
$1.2M
23/55 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%
01What it does

What United Mission For Relief & Development does

Mission

Provide humanitarian assistance such as medicines, healthcare, food, water, and hygiene supplies to displaced, disadvantaged persons, and refugees due to disasters and wars.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Health Services and Nutrition: In 2024, UMR scaled its global health programs to reach vulnerable populations in conflict and disaster zones. In Gaza, UMR supported medical centers and provided essential medicines to major hospitals. In Yemen and Sudan, UMR supplied medicines health facilities and supported the treatment of malnourished children through CMAM programs. In Jordan, UMR provided chronic care and kidney dialysis support to hundreds of refugee patients and led medical missions in collaboration with IMANA, offering free specialized surgeries and consultations. Across all programs, UMR integrated nutrition services for pregnant and lactating women, with a focus on maternal and child health, in partnership with UNICEF and MOH. individuals with hearing impairments. Through UMRs strengthened health systems, we supported health facilities and equipment in Turkey, Libya, Uganda, and Yemen. Moreover, UMR launched a comprehensive nutritional program focused on children and pregnant or lactating women in Yemen and Kenya, targeting thousands of the most vulnerable groups in partnership with the Ministry of Health, nutrition cluster, and UNICEF.

    $143,770,480 spentof which $143,125,808 as grants
    98% of program spending
  2. Food Security and Livelihood: UMRs 2024 food assistance reached millions of meals distributed across Gaza, Sudan, Yemen, Jordan, and Kenya. In Gaza, 7,000 hot meals and 1,500 wheat sacks were delivered during the war crisis. In Sudan, UMR distributed 1.7 million fortified meals to pregnant women, lactating mothers, orphans, and IDPs. The organizations Adopt a Village smart agriculture program in Kenya expanded into Phase 3, training over 300 youth in hydroponics. Seasonal food distributions during Ramadan and Qurbani supported over tens of thousands of families.

    $1,207,367 spentof which $1,201,953 as grants
    1% of program spending
  3. Advocacy, Education, and Capacity Building: UMR enhanced its global advocacy and training footprint in 2024. The organization hosted a regional conference on Autism and Disability Inclusion in Jordan and launched programs supporting children with autism in refugee camps. In Yemen, UMR has trained health staff on IMCI and community volunteers on CMAM. In the USA UMR university chapters and community members received PMP trainings.

    $728,232 spentof which $724,960 as grants
    0% of program spending
  4. WASH and Emergency Response: UMR responded to multiple emergencies in 2024, including the ongoing conflicts in Gaza, and the cholera outbreaks in Yemen, as well as the floods in Kenya, and displacement crises in Lebanon. In WASH, UMR constructed wells in Pakistan, Somalia, and Kenya, and expanded drought relief efforts in East Africa. Each well served approximately 1,000-2,000 people with sustainable water access, contributing to improved health and community resilience.

    $795,076 spentof which $791,509 as grants
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $146,501,155.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($81M) Expenses 100 ($80M) Net assets 100 ($883k)2018 Revenue 104 ($84M) Expenses 103 ($83M) Net assets 196 ($1.7M)2019 Revenue 22 ($18M) Expenses 24 ($20M) Net assets -8 ($-69596)2020 Revenue 51 ($41M) Expenses 49 ($39M) Net assets 183 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 30 ($24M) Expenses 29 ($23M) Net assets 292 ($2.6M)2022 Revenue 22 ($18M) Expenses 23 ($18M) Net assets 216 ($1.9M)2023 Revenue 71 ($58M) Expenses 72 ($58M) Net assets 189 ($1.7M)2024 Revenue 186 ($150M) Expenses 187 ($150M) Net assets 138 ($1.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (186)Expenses (187)Net assets (138)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $243k to $2.3M (+840%).

$2.0M
$2.1M
$243k
$2.3M
$2.9M
$2.5M
$2.5M
$2.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$355k
’17
$849k
’18
−$1.8M
’19
$1.7M
’20
$966k
’21
−$669k
’22
−$241k
’23
−$451k
’24
0.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Abed Ayoub

CEO and President

Board chair

Samer Darwish

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed661177667
Joined·+0+9+0+0+2+0+1
No longer listed·0440300
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 18 funders, grant income rose $50k → $483k.

18 of 55 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 69% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of United Mission For Relief & Development’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 55 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

United Mission For Relief & Development has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund United Mission For Relief & Development.

22%
largest funder
58%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 45% · 2018 31% · 2019 52% · 2020 65% · 2021 49% · 2022 53% · 2023 36% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

17% of United Mission For Relief & Development's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

69% of United Mission For Relief & Development's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $923k that is directly attributable, 99% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 15 states.

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 12 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like United Mission For Relief & Development

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 1%Fundraising 2%

Governance

6
board members
67%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

VA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for United Mission For Relief & Development: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development?
United Mission For Relief & Development (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 55 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,937,139 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($647,938). 23 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 69% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does United Mission For Relief & Development have?
IRS filings report 55 organizations giving $2,937,139 in grants to United Mission For Relief & Development, 23 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of United Mission For Relief & Development?
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $647,938 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like United Mission For Relief & Development find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 55 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing