· Public charity
Islamic Medical Association of North America
Imana fosters health promotion, disease prevention, and health maintenance in communities around the world through direct patient care, health programs, and advocacy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $725,402 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,993,418 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,268,016 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $147k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $570k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| B'DESH FOUNDATION | $131,250 |
| UNITED MUSLIM RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT | $119,497 |
| AL MUSTAFA CHARITABLE TRUST | $107,000 |
| SEED | $95,000 |
| AGHOSH ALKHIDMAT USA | $62,500 |
| AFRICA RELIEF & COMMUNITY DEVELOPME | $55,000 |
| PURE HANDS INC | $44,655 |
| COMPREHESIVE DISASTER | $40,500 |
| HEAL PALESTINE INC | $25,000 |
| ZAKAT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIAL SERVICES | $12,000 |
| CLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $213k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.3M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UMUnited Mission For Relief & Development2× · 2023–2024 · $293k · revenue +160%
- SFSUPPORT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT2× · 2023–2024 · $207k · revenue +13%
- BDB DESH FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $166k · revenue +0%
Funded once
- SASudanese American Physicians Assngraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +107%
- IMINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.
Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.
To help africans in need. our main focus is getting food, shelter, clothing and medicine to the needy
Medical care and education to under-served communities around the world.
Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world
Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Zakat Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Al Mustafa Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development ↗
- Who funds Al Mustafa Charitable Trust ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds B DESH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF ↗
- Who funds AGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Africa Relief and Community Development ↗
- Who funds Sudanese American Physicians Assn ↗
- Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CLARKSTON COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Islamic Medical Association of North America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Islamic Medical Association of North America?
Find your warmest path to Islamic Medical Association of North America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.