How much did SAYA FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of SAYA FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

social

2019

claremontreligious

2020

—

2021

socialeducation welfare

2022

islamic

2023

religious

2024

awarenesshealth carereligious

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $50k
$10k–50k15 grants · $282k
$50k–250k3 grants · $457k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER$214,750
THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION$192,034
NEW HORIZON SCHOOL WESTSIDE$50,000
VARIOUS DONATIONS LESS THAN 5000$44,422
MHEF USA$40,000
MPAC FOUNDATION$40,000
THE WOODDROW WILSON CENTER$30,000
WORLD MEMON ORGANIZATION USA INC$20,000
SHAHID AFRIDI FOUNDATION$15,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF SOUTHERN CAL$11,650
DEVELOPMENT-IN-LITERACY$10,500
ZINDAGI TRUST INC$10,000
NEW GROUND$10,000
HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL$10,000
ANERA$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 89% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.1M · 29 repeat orgs$587k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.1M

$277k

Still filing today

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyReligionPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NH
NEW HORIZON SCHOOL WESTSIDE
8× · 2017–2024 · $377k · revenue +21%
TJ
THE JOHN THOMAS DYE SCHOOL
5× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +63%
HW
HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL
5× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +17%

Funded once

UO
UBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATION FUND
one grant, 2021 · $100k
RC
RAHMA CENTER
one grant, 2023 · $25k
OC
OC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT
one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Darul Arqam School

Our mission is to provide an excellent islamic & academic education within an islamic environment to produce well rounded muslims and strong leaders.we seek to promote safe,caring, supportive environment where kids can attain them to…

Unclassified

Hamza Academy

School

Education

Darushifa Healthcare Inc

We help underprivileged men, women and children in the United States and in developing countries such as Pakistan, and we support domestic and international healthcare for those in need.

Health

Habib University Foundation Us Inc

Hufus' mission is to support higher education in pakistan through support of habib university, pakistan's first not-for-profit, liberal arts and sciences university and a unique example of american education tradition and quality in…

Education

Razi School

Razi school has been established to provide our students an excellent education in an islamic environment while giving them the academic tools to become accomplished muslims in a competitive society.

Education

The Huda Academy

Our primary mission is to give students a strong sense of belonging to the muslim community, to provide excellent well-rounded education in a healthy islamic environment, and to provide students with a solid grounding in islam and arabic,…

Education

Uswa Educational Association

Uswa educational association is committed to helping the poor and needy chilren of pakistan. these children are helpfed through schools established by jabir bin haya trust, islamabad, pakistan. this organization has established over sixty…

International

Harkham-Gaon Academy

to operate an independent community high school which PROVIDES A CHALLENGING, NURTURING, INCLUSIVE, JEWISH AND ACADEMIC LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR its students. our students represent a very diverse group from families at every level of…

—

New Horizon School Irvine

New horizon is committed to providing students with an excellent academic education and firm grounding in moral and ethical values.

Education

Masjidullahs New Medina Learning Institute

New Medina is a private educational institution comprised of both primary (Kindergarten through 5th grade) and secondary (6th through 12th grade) class levels. Our primary class levels offer a child-centered structure that fosters each…

Education

Alim Academy Inc

A private, non-profit, non-sectarian school adhering islamic values.

—

Shiv Nadar Foundation

Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Archer School for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Healthcare Initiatives Now Empowering Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

8/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,010,156Education$487,275Philanthropy$67,630Religion$45,000Public Safety & Disaster$41,000International$25,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Al-Ameen FoundationCA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Al-Ameen Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SAYA FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 593839139 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 19% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Saya Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Saya Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SAYA FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Saya Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SAYA FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Saya Foundation?

More from the funding graph