Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium

Optimizing health and well-being through collaborative partnerships and services.

$32M
Granted FY2024still arriving
88
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$194MEnvironment$54MHuman Services$21MHousing & Shelter$4.0MCommunity Improvement$1.8MArts & Culture$1.6MEducation$1.5MCivil Rights$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 88 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $935k
  • $50k–250k34 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+21 grants · $27M
$65,899
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK$2,790,195
NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORP$2,716,786
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION$2,649,370
BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORP$2,456,054
TANANA NATIVE COUNCIL$1,951,397
COPPER RIVER NATIVE ASSOC$1,886,762
CHUGACHMIUT$1,611,503
KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION$1,596,058
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION$1,587,918
YUKON KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORP$1,582,603
KENAITZE INDIAN TRIBE$999,483
ANNETTE ISLAND SERVICE UNIT$913,993
NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH$825,449
SEARHC$793,639
ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLAND ASSOC$787,764
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $40.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEALTH NATIVE COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED: $38k → 22%SMALL TRIBES ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $172k → 9%HEALTH NATIVE COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED: $16k → 22%SMALL TRIBES ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $108k → 9%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $23k → 12%SMALL TRIBES ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation: $1.7M → 22%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $7k → 12%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $7.1M → 8%Kenaitze Indian Tribe: $740k → 11%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $2.8M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $2.2M → 8%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.8M → 8%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $1.6M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.6M → 8%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $1.4M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.4M → 8%Maniilaq Association: $1.0M → 20%Kodiak Area Native Association: $803k → 8%Maniilaq Association: $957k → 20%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $891k → 20%Kodiak Area Native Association: $629k → 8%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $824k → 20%Maniilaq Association: $559k → 20%Copper River Native Association: $127k → 14%March of Dimes: $8k → 22%COVENANT HOUSE: $13k → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $2.0M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.6M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.4M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.3M → 10%Chugachmiut: $1.2M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.2M → 10%Chugachmiut: $1.2M → 10%Chugachmiut: $1.2M → 10%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $28k → 10%Cook Inlet Tribal Council: $25k → 10%COOK INLET TRIBAL COUNCIL INC: $25k → 10%Cook Inlet Tribal Council: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MA
OR
CA
CO
KY
VA
NM
DC
OK
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$266M · 74 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.

74 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
48

Total granted

$266M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+61%

Still filing today

47%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Southcentral Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23M · revenue +71%
  • TC
    Tanana Chiefs Conference
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +16%
  • SA
    SOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • SI
    STAR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6.7M · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2.5M · revenue +66% · 35% of their budget
  • KC
    Klawock Cooperative Association
    one grant, 2019 · $942k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium

Optimizing health and well-being through collaborative partnerships and services.

Health
2
Alaska Nannut Co-Management Council

The alaska nannut co-management council (ancc) was established to represent the collective alaska native voice in polar bear co-management. ancc is a tribally authorized organization with membership consisting of the 15 tribes in alaska…

Animals
3
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
4
Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska

Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.

Arts & Culture
5
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
6
Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association

The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…

—
7
Iliuliuk Family & Health Services

To provide comprehensive medical, dental, and behavioral health care through the operation of its clinic in Unalaska, Alaska. The clinic's mission is to provide care to all, regardless of ability to pay, and to specialize in providing care…

Health
8
Chugach Regional Resources Commission

The Chugach Regional Resources Commission (the Commission) was established for the purpose of providing formal advocacy to manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.

—
9
Alaska Native Justice Center

Promoting justice through culturally-based advocacy, prevention, and intervention initiatives to restore dignity, respect, and humanity to all Alaska natives.

Civil Rights
10
Healing Native Hearts Coalition

A tribal domestic violence coalition for the interior tribes of alaska. providing support and referral services for tribal governments and victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
11
Ahtna Intertribal Resource Commission

The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…

Environment
12
Bristol Bay Native Association Inc

The Mission of BBNA is to maintain and promote a strong regional organization supported by the Tribes of Bristol Bay to serve as a unified voice to provide social, economic, cultural, educational opportunities and initiatives to benefit…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Shaktoolik Native Store Native Village of Shaktoolik. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersRural Utility CooperativesAlaska Native Community Sto…Youth Sports & Recreation O…Animal Rescue and Hospice S…Alaska Cultural Heritage Or…Alaska Industry Trade Assoc…Faith-Based Social ServicesUnion Trade Apprenticeship …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr12%2%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr18%14%20–35yr19%47%35–55yr17%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%7%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr18%7%20–35yr19%86%35–55yr17%1%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/155
the rest of the field
11%
358/3,331

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/57
Grantees still filing
42/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF KOTZEBUE — $20,736,122 · OtherCITY OF KOTZEBUEState Of Alaska — $20,393,985 · OtherState Of AlaskaYUKON-KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORPORATION — $14,836,131 · OtherYUKON-KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORPORATIONCITY OF HOONAH — $8,428,836 · OtherCITY OF HOONAHKETCHIKAN INDIAN CORPORATION — $8,173,857 · OtherKETCHIKAN INDIAN CORPORATIONSTAR INC — $6,749,521 · OtherKENAITZE INDIAN TRIBE — $6,685,851 · OtherARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION — $6,189,785 · OtherCopper River Native Association Inc — $4,929,653 · OtherANNETTE ISLAND SERVICE UNIT — $4,428,836 · Other+114 more — $30,135,953 · Other+114 moreSouthcentral Foundation — $23,278,508 · HealthSouthcentral FoundationTanana Chiefs Conference — $16,611,530 · HealthTanana Chiefs ConferenceSOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $16,545,627 · HealthSOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSOR…Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation — $15,587,246 · HealthBristol Bay Area Health CorporationNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION — $12,530,599 · HealthNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATIONHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION — $12,320,681 · HealthHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION+7 more — $369,519 · HealthKodiak Area Native Association — $16,477,215 · Human ServicesKodiak Area Nati…CHUGACHMIUT — $11,286,756 · Human ServicesCHUGACHMIUTManiilaq Association — $9,114,590 · Human ServicesManiilaq Associa…THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT — $1,722,371 · Human Services+6 more — $1,391,667 · Human ServicesALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,334,315 · Community ImprovementRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $982,402 · Community Improvement+2 more — $103,244 · Community ImprovementSEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE — $2,549,583 · AnimalsEastern Aleutian Tribes Inc — $1,307,635 · EducationAlaska Pacific University — $445,975 · EducationALASKA SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSN INC — $100,000 · Education+3 more — $124,735 · EducationFood Bank of Alaska — $504,115 · Food & Nutrition
Other$131,688,530Health$97,243,710Human Services$39,992,599Community Improvement$8,419,961Animals$2,549,583Education$1,978,345Food & Nutrition$504,115

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSouthcentral Foundation — $23,278,508 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTanana Chiefs Conference — $16,611,530 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $16,545,627 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetKodiak Area Native Association — $16,477,215 over 8y, 15% of budgetBristol Bay Area Health Corporation — $15,587,246 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION — $12,530,599 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION — $12,320,681 over 6y, 95% of budgetCHUGACHMIUT — $11,286,756 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetManiilaq Association — $9,114,590 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,334,315 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION — $6,189,785 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCopper River Native Association Inc — $4,929,653 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetSEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE — $2,549,583 over 1y, 35% of budgetALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD — $2,152,411 over 7y, 40% of budgetTHE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT — $1,722,371 over 3y, 47% of budgetEastern Aleutian Tribes Inc — $1,307,635 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $982,402 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFood Bank of Alaska — $504,115 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAlaska Pacific University — $445,975 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSmall Tribes Organization of Western Washington — $349,184 over 3y, 10% of budgetNORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $210,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCook Inlet Tribal Council — $196,968 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetValdez Native Tribe — $125,339 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetALASKA SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSN INC — $100,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAlaska Special Olympics DBA Special Olympics Alaska Inc — $75,990 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE — $69,217 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $58,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE — $55,808 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlaska Village Electric Cooperative Inc — $52,222 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCold Climate Housing Research Center — $49,404 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $49,029 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Alaska Community Foundation — $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHITE MOUNTAIN NATIVE STORE NATIVE VILLAGE OF WHITE MOUNTAIN — $36,101 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNuvista Light & Electric Cooperative Inc — $34,027 over 1y, 12% of budgetBUCKLAND NATIVE STORE NATIVE VILLAGE OF BUCKLAND — $32,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAlaska Native Heritage Center Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCatholic Social Services — $28,255 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $27,758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES — $27,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSouthern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA — $23,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP FIRE ALASKA — $21,384 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $19,898 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $19,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA BUSINESS WEEK — $15,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetGREATER ANCHORAGE INC — $11,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southcentral Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Tanana Chiefs Conference ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds Kodiak Area Native Association ↗
  • Who funds Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHUGACHMIUT ↗
  • Who funds Maniilaq Association ↗
  • Who funds ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Copper River Native Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD ↗
  • Who funds THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Aleutian Tribes Inc ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ANCHORAGE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Alaska ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community …Rasmuson FoundationFirst Nations Develop…Alaska Children's Tru…Alaska Conservation F…Valley Hospital Assoc…First Alaskans Instit…Cook Inlet Tribal Cou…Tanana Chiefs Confere…Southcentral Foundati…Rural Alaska Communit…Coastal Villages Regi…
The Alaska Community FoundationAK83.5× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Alaska Children's Trust · Alaska Conservation Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · First Alaskans Institute · Cook Inlet Tribal Council · Tanana Chiefs Conference · Southcentral Foundation · Rural Alaska Community Action Program Foundation · Coastal Villages Region Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 70%
  • Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation — 83% of income from government
  • Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board — 70% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines