How much did ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

hss goodgood wellnesswellness specialsamshaeducationlearningindian

2020

medstarspecial olympicsresearchsnap contingencycontingency snapsnap fdpirfdpir sae

2021

dhattribescdbg blockadvocacyjohnson o'malleysnap contingencycontingency snap

2022

sewer systemdeptsnap contingencycontingency snapsnap fdpirfdpir saealaskan

2023

constructionsanitation facilityfacility improvementengineeringwaste waterlearningwater sewer

2024

environmental gaphopital clinicslowereconomicpcc hopitalbiomed hopitalsanitation facilities

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 88 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $17k
$10k–50k31 grants · $935k
$50k–250k34 grants · $3.5M
$250k+21 grants · $27M

$65,899

Median grant

States reached

$2.9B

Total assets

Largest grants

NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK$2,790,195
NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORP$2,716,786
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION$2,649,370
BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORP$2,456,054
TANANA NATIVE COUNCIL$1,951,397
COPPER RIVER NATIVE ASSOC$1,886,762
CHUGACHMIUT$1,611,503
KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION$1,596,058
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION$1,587,918
YUKON KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORP$1,582,603
KENAITZE INDIAN TRIBE$999,483
ANNETTE ISLAND SERVICE UNIT$913,993
NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH$825,449
SEARHC$793,639
ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLAND ASSOC$787,764

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $36.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$246M · 69 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

69 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$246M

$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

+43%

Still filing today

48%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SA
Southeast Alaska Regional Health Corporation
7× · 2018–2024 · $21M · revenue +58%
TN
Tanana Native Council
7× · 2018–2024 · $16M · revenue +19%
MA
Maniilaq Association
7× · 2018–2024 · $16M · revenue +72%

Funded once

SO
State Of Alaskagraduated
one grant, 2018 · $6.7M · revenue +62%
SF
Southcentral Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $2.5M · revenue +66% · 35% of their budget
KC
Klawock Cooperative Association
one grant, 2019 · $942k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bering Omega Community Health Services

Bering omega community health services exists to nurture the well being and meet the physical emotional and spiritual needs of persons affected by hiv/aids through compassionate health care and social services.

Health

Fairbanks Native Association

To promote spirituality, cultural identity, self-reliance, physical and mental health, by improving the quality of life for of our community through professional quality services.

Health

Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative

Environment

Alaska Historical Publication Association

Education

Alaska Wildlife Conservation

Awcc is a sanctuary dedicated to preserving alaska's wildlife through conservation, research, education, and quality animal care.

Animals

Alaska World Affairs Council

Education regarding world affairs.

International

Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission

To safeguard the bowhead whale and its habitat, to defend the Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling Rights of our members, and to preserve the cultural and traditional values of our communities.

—

Alaska State Hockey Association Inc

Youth & adult hockey leagues, tournaments & camps promote youth hockey, develop and encourage sportmanship between all players for the betterment of the individuals physical & social well being.

Unclassified

Veterans in Service to Alaskans

To assist disadvantaged united states military veterans and active duty personnel through financial and emotional support; to promote public awareness of their plight; to protect all inalienable rights and interests of the member and the…

Arts & Culture

Alaska Zoo

Conservation, education, research, and community enrichment of arctic, sub-arctic, and like-climate animals.

Animals

Nordic Skiing Association of Anchorage

Nordic Skiing Association of Anchorage (NSAA) is dedicated to promoting all forms of Nordic skiing as a healthy form of individual and family activity. See Part III, line 1 and Schedule O for additional details.

Recreation & Sports

Senior Citizens of Interior Ak

To promote friendship, project plans, and programs for the elderly.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aleutian Pribilof Islands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%2/154

the rest of the field

316/3,332

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

55 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

53/55

Grantees still filing

47/55

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$121,484,740Health$91,526,907Human Services$36,912,365Community Improvement$7,956,438Animals$2,549,583Education$1,762,229Food & Nutrition$504,115

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK91.5× affinity56 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Children's Trust · Valley Hospital Association Inc · First Alaskans Institute · Cook Inlet Tribal Council · Tanana Chiefs Conference · Rural Alaska Community Action Program · Alaska Conservation Foundation · The Carr Foundation Inc · Seventh Generation Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~62 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821850261 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 62 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium?

Find your warmest path to Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

55 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium?

More from the funding graph

ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

55 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium?

More from the funding graph