Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gordon D Sondland and Katherine J Durant Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$780
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
States reached
$780
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.2MHealth$170kHuman Services$51kArts & Culture$48kAnimals$20kYouth Development$15kEnvironment$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$409k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$780
Median grant
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ULTRA PROPERTIES LIMITED-SIMONGA VILLAGE PROJECT$780
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OREGON HARBOR OF HOPE: $50k → 12%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
OH
NJ
CA
DE
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 12 repeat orgs$476k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
28

Total granted

$2.5M
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+50%

Still filing today

58%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.1M · revenue +51%
  • JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $101k · revenue +126%
  • PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $98k · revenue +256%

Funded once

  • CE
    CHARLES & EMMA FRYE FREE PUBLIC ART MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $130k · revenue +38%
  • JH
    JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Providence Hood River Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
2
Providence Seaside Hospital Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
3
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
4
Providence Milwaukie Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
5
Providence General Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Unclassified
6
Providence Plan Partners

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
7
Providence Inland Northwest Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
8
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

9
University of Oregon Foundation

The purpose and mission of the foundation are, acting on its own or through affiliates, to support and assist the university of oregon in its activities by management and administration of foundation assets representing privately donated…

Education
10
Providence Facey Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

11
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

12
St Joseph Health System

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Portland Medical Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Charles & Emma Frye Free Public Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsCancer Support OrganizationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…At-Risk Youth MentoringChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community FederationsWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Homeless Services & ShelterCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr14%37%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr12%1%35–55yr12%89%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,153

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,100,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $101,000 · Education+3 more — $21,500 · EducationCHARLES & EMMA FRYE FREE PUBLIC ART MUSEUM — $130,000 · OtherCHARLES & EMMA F…JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL — $60,000 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHO…ATULEO AMANZI-SIMONGA VILLAGE PROJECT — $53,900 · OtherATULEO AMANZI-SI…OHSU FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATIONCITY OF SEATTLE — $25,000 · OtherCITY OF SEATTLEIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · Other+17 more — $88,860 · Other+17 morePROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $98,083 · HealthKEX KIDS FUND — $50,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Health+3 more — $9,500 · HealthOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE — $50,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,350 · Human ServicesPORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $30,471 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $18,000 · Arts & CultureSAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · AnimalsELEVATE OREGON — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$2,222,500Other$422,760Health$169,583Human Services$51,350Arts & Culture$48,471Animals$20,000Youth Development$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLES & EMMA FRYE FREE PUBLIC ART MUSEUM — $130,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $98,083 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKEX KIDS FUND — $50,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $30,471 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES — $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOLVE — $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIRACLES CLUB — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KEEP A BREAST FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR24.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Mentor Graphics Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Rmf Foundation · Wheeler Foundation · R H Parkerunited Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gordon D Sondland and Katherine J Durant Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • The Miracles Club70% of income from government
  • Elevate Oregon28% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East14% of income from government
  • Providence Portland Medical Foundation5% of income from government
  • Solve5% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum1% of income from government
  • Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph