Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

GIFTS - RWANDA

GIFTS - RWANDA (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $47,685 to it, the largest being THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ($46,685). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$189k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$48k
Net assets
$38k
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%
01What it does

What Gifts - Rwanda does

Mission

The mission is to follow the lead of the locals in rugarika,rwanda, responding only when invited, to help make real, sustainable change in the village and encourage and support abundant, joyful filled lives.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Education support: provided tuition fees and school materials to 5 university, 76 secondary, and 44 primary students. Women's group: a group of women is formed and trained to receive support in making bags, body lotion, and soaps. Health insurance: health insurance was provided for poor families in nyarubuye cell. Community gardens and livestock: families in need received domestic animals (goats, rabbits, and chickens) and some seeds to make gardens at their home. House construction: two houses will be built to help poor families.

    $121,718 spentof which $111,109 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $121,718.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($110k) Expenses 100 ($75k) Net assets 100 ($44k)2023 Revenue 107 ($118k) Expenses 182 ($135k) Net assets 60 ($26k)2024 Revenue 82 ($90k) Expenses 141 ($105k) Net assets 27 ($12k)2025 Revenue 172 ($189k) Expenses 219 ($163k) Net assets 86 ($38k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (172)Expenses (219)Net assets (86)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $12k to $38k (+216%).

$44k
$26k
$12k
$38k
2022202320242025
Total assets

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of GIFTS - RWANDA’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (73% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,456 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$35k
’22
−$17k
’23
−$15k
’24
$26k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $11k → $13k.

Funder
'22
'23
'25*
total
funders
1
2
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 98% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GIFTS - RWANDA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GIFTS - RWANDA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GIFTS - RWANDA.

98%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 92% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

98% of GIFTS - RWANDA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 1 state.

FL

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $47k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GIFTS - RWANDA has grown faster than three-quarters of the 904 unclassified nonprofits its size.

Operating margin14% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)20% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 904 unclassified nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like GIFTS - RWANDA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

WA
OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GIFTS - RWANDA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GIFTS - RWANDA?
GIFTS - RWANDA (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $47,685 to it, the largest being THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ($46,685). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GIFTS - RWANDA have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $47,685 in grants to GIFTS - RWANDA, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GIFTS - RWANDA?
THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND is the largest funder on record, with $46,685 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GIFTS - RWANDA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Gifts - Rwanda →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing