Skip to content

Kansas · Nonprofit

THE MISSION PROJECT INC

THE MISSION PROJECT INC (Kansas) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $729,034 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($110,122). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$484k
Funders on record
28
Grants received
$729k
Net assets
$745k
16/28 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What The Mission Project Inc does

Mission

The mission project, inc. Enables capable adults with developmental disabilities to live independently and safely in community with individualized support.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Transportation is provided for all participants, 22 in 2025. These services provide rides to and from work with 7,610 rides provided in 2025 around the kc area. These rides allow participants to arrive at work on time (5 minutes before shift) and to be picked up after their shift and delivered home safely. We have a 99.6% rate of delivering participants to work on time which increases their ability to continue working. Due to the nature of their disabilities, participants have trouble using public transportation and either do not want to or cannot drive their own vehicles.

    $69,000 spent
    24% of program spending
  2. Core programming is one of the larger budget areas where we apply our grants and donations. The mission project holds problem solvers and community strong groups on a weekly and bi-weekly basis. These groups use ot and mental health-based practices to help provide tools and support to the participants for independent living. In addition, one-on-one services are provided for participants who are struggling with certain things. This could be anything from managing their daily schedule to grocery shopping to hygiene. Ot based services look for tools or inventive ways to help the participants manage their daily lives.

    $207,395 spent$287,552 earned by the program
    72% of program spending
  3. Fitness and nutrition are also areas that we often use for grant seeking or donations. Due to the nature of intellectual and developmental disabilities, participants often have secondary diagnoses and develop issues as they age (much quicker than the regular population). They have higher rates of risk for heart disease, diabetes, sleep apnea, depression, anxiety, etc.) because of this, it is important that they learn about having a healthy lifestyle with fitness and nutrition, the mission project partners with move right quarterly to determine level of fitness and health for comparisons. The participants have all been very adamant about participating in this program and we have seen positive changes for each participant. Everyone has made a marked increase in functional movement that allows them to perform every day tasks and be healthier overall.

    $10,987 spent
    4% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $287,382.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($281k) Expenses 100 ($320k) Net assets 100 ($224k)2018 Revenue 139 ($391k) Expenses 105 ($336k) Net assets 123 ($276k)2019 Revenue 105 ($297k) Expenses 128 ($409k) Net assets 73 ($164k)2020 Revenue 172 ($484k) Expenses 98 ($315k) Net assets 149 ($333k)2021 Revenue 154 ($435k) Expenses 113 ($363k) Net assets 178 ($399k)2022 Revenue 163 ($457k) Expenses 114 ($366k) Net assets 217 ($486k)2023 Revenue 169 ($476k) Expenses 130 ($416k) Net assets 246 ($551k)2024 Revenue 143 ($402k) Expenses 114 ($366k) Net assets 262 ($586k)2025 Revenue 172 ($484k) Expenses 101 ($325k) Net assets 333 ($745k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (172)Expenses (101)Net assets (333)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $594k to $752k (+27%).

$224k
$288k
$176k
$334k
$412k
$488k
$557k
$594k
$752k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

65% of THE MISSION PROJECT INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$39k
’17
$55k
’18
−$112k
’19
$169k
’20
$72k
’21
$91k
’22
$60k
’23
$36k
’24
$159k
’25
27
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed17119899998
Joined·+7+8+4+3+0+3+0+1
No longer listed·1310520302
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $20k → $73k.

10 of 28 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE MISSION PROJECT INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE MISSION PROJECT INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 15% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE MISSION PROJECT INC.

15%
largest funder
37%
top three
~12
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 49% · 2018 34% · 2019 34% · 2020 19% · 2021 41% · 2022 36% · 2023 28% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of THE MISSION PROJECT INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

54% of THE MISSION PROJECT INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $337k that is directly attributable, 52% of it comes from funders outside Kansas, across 8 states.

MN
IL
OH
PA
MO
KS
TN
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Kansas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $392k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE MISSION PROJECT INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin33% · top quartile
Months of reserve26.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like THE MISSION PROJECT INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Kansas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
63%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

63%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

KS

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE MISSION PROJECT INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE MISSION PROJECT INC?
THE MISSION PROJECT INC (Kansas) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $729,034 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($110,122). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE MISSION PROJECT INC have?
IRS filings report 28 organizations giving $729,034 in grants to THE MISSION PROJECT INC, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE MISSION PROJECT INC?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $110,122 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE MISSION PROJECT INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kansas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mission Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 28 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing