· Private foundation
Kiewit Companies Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k80 grants · $273k
- $10k–50k39 grants · $602k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $950k
- $250k+2 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| TEAMMATES FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| CUES SCHOOL SYSTEM | $200,000 |
| OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS | $105,000 |
| NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION | $105,000 |
| OMAHA MULTI SPORTS COMPLEX | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER HOUSTON | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS | $100,000 |
| DURHAM MUSEUM | $75,000 |
| THE ROSE THEATRE | $65,000 |
| OMAHA SYMPHONY | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $50,000 |
| JDRF | $32,000 |
| GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY FDN | $30,000 |
| CAMERON EDU & CHARITABLE ENDEAVORS | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connected Roots Care Center and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds TEAMMATES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds OMAHA MULTI SPORT COMPLEX ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MDRC ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
- Who funds OMAHA SUMMER ARTS FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds Driscoll Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center ↗
- Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Bisbee Arizona ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Crime Stoppers Program Inc ↗
- Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
- Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Parker Family Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kiewit Companies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley — 6% of income from government
- Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc — 5% of income from government
- Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.