Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Green Mountain Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$501k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Green Mountain Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
20
5
21
4
22
1
23
3
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$2.3MArts & Culture$47kEducation$46kHuman Services$36kHousing & Shelter$17kReligion$14kFood & Nutrition$100
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$500,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$500,000
LIFE UNLIMITED (HATS OFF TO MOTHERS)$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE MISSION PROJECT: $1k → 5%UPLIFT ORGANIZATION INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CO
MO
AZ
KS
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$210k · 7 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
19

Total granted

$210k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+22%

Still filing today

71%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PE
    PARKINSONS EXERCISE AND WELLNESS CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +228%
  • HO
    HEART OF AMERICA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $31k · revenue +56%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL
    2× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +78%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +34%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
4
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
12
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mission Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is George & Michael Gardner Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC — $2,000,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICPARKINSONS EXERCISE AND WELLNESS CENTER — $150,000 · HealthPARKINSONS EXERCISE AND WELLNESS CENTERST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 · HealthTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER — $25,000 · OtherFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH — $11,000 · OtherHIGGINS BROTHER SURGI CENTER OF HOPE — $10,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC — $6,000 · OtherCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · Other+6 more — $5,050 · OtherHEART OF AMERICA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $31,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL — $11,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY — $2,500 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureUPLIFT ORGANIZATION INC — $9,500 · Human ServicesTHE MISSION PROJECT INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $2,500 · EducationTeachers College Columbia University — $2,000 · EducationGEORGE & MICHAEL GARDNER FUND — $500 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $7,000 · Public Benefit
Health$2,250,000Other$92,050Arts & Culture$47,000Human Services$10,500Education$10,250Public Benefit$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $2,000,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSONS EXERCISE AND WELLNESS CENTER — $150,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $31,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFT ORGANIZATION INC — $9,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC — $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MISSION PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE & MICHAEL GARDNER FUND — $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · John and Bernice Hamra Foundation · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Richard J Stern Foundation for the Arts Commerce Bank Trustee · J B Reynolds Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · The Sherman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Green Mountain Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph