Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY

RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY (Ohio) receives grants from 58 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,359,371 to it, the largest being YOUNGSTOWN FDN GENERAL ($1,096,797). 35 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$4.1M
Funders on record
58
Grants received
$3.4M
Net assets
$12M
35/58 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 18%
01What it does

What Rescue Mission of Mahoning Valley does

Mission

By god's grace, the Rescue Mission of Mahoning Valley exists to proclaim the gospel of jesus christ while providing food, emergency shelter, and promote accountability to men, women, and families experiencing homelessness.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Emergency program - at the mission, our emergency program is the first stop for all clients seeking assistance. Each person has a unique story that has led them to our doors. Many have hit rock-bottom and have no place else to turn. Support of the mission provides a safe haven to individual men and women and families in need, including married couples, single mothers and single fathers. Our guests receive nutritious meals and a clean bed, along with the opportunity to take a deep breath and assess their situation during the first seven days of their stay. Our staff works closely with each guest to create a personalized plan to transition out of homelessness as they engage in one of our other three programs: transitional, workforce, workforce assistance.

    $862,079 spentof which $107,203 as grants
    34% of program spending
  2. Workforce assistance - anything received from our community helps assist our clients to achieve his or her transition plan while they seek employment as they stay at the shelter. Individuals in this program are also provided with nutritious meals and a clean bed as well as accountability check-ins from client advisors.

    $869,664 spentof which $109,667 as grants
    34% of program spending
  3. Transitional program - our program is designed to help those who are unable to work. We offer overnight emergency shelter and nutritious meals, biblical counseling and learning center access. We collaborate with third-party agencies to ensure the best possible care for our guests, to ensure accountability, guests participate in frequent reviews, and those with an income take part in our savings program. We return 100% of savings to the client.

    $680,057 spentof which $158,545 as grants
    27% of program spending
  4. Working program - your partnership provides everything our transitional guests receive as the client works to achieve his or her transition plan while they are currently employed and staying at the shelter.

    $116,292 spentof which $35,323 as grants
    5% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,528,092.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.1M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2018 Revenue 93 ($2.9M) Expenses 94 ($2.2M) Net assets 130 ($3.2M)2019 Revenue 130 ($4.0M) Expenses 97 ($2.2M) Net assets 204 ($4.9M)2020 Revenue 140 ($4.3M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 287 ($7.0M)2021 Revenue 164 ($5.1M) Expenses 112 ($2.6M) Net assets 391 ($9.5M)2022 Revenue 136 ($4.2M) Expenses 146 ($3.4M) Net assets 428 ($10M)2023 Revenue 142 ($4.4M) Expenses 153 ($3.5M) Net assets 465 ($11M)2024 Revenue 118 ($3.7M) Expenses 162 ($3.7M) Net assets 476 ($12M)2025 Revenue 131 ($4.1M) Expenses 178 ($4.1M) Net assets 483 ($12M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (131)Expenses (178)Net assets (483)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $7.1M to $9.9M (+40%).

$2.5M
$3.3M
$5.1M
$7.1M
$9.9M
$10M
$11M
$12M
$12M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (39% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$791k
’17
$734k
’18
$1.8M
’19
$2.0M
’20
$2.5M
’21
$862k
’22
$866k
’23
−$73k
’24
−$40k
’25
8.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

John Muckridge

Mission president/CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed677677677
Joined·+2+0+0+1+2+0+1+2
No longer listed·10102102
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 10 funders to 25 funders, grant income fell $266k → $232k.

11 of 58 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 56% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 58 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 33% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY.

33%
largest funder
59%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 64% · 2018 70% · 2019 56% · 2020 61% · 2021 42% · 2022 25% · 2023 22% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

56% of RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.5M that is directly attributable, 74% of it comes from Ohio funders.

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
DE
NC
MS
GA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.9M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY is better cushioned than half of the 2,367 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve8.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,367 housing & shelter nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 11%Fundraising 27%

Governance

7
board members
57%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY?
RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY (Ohio) receives grants from 58 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,359,371 to it, the largest being YOUNGSTOWN FDN GENERAL ($1,096,797). 35 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY have?
IRS filings report 58 organizations giving $3,359,371 in grants to RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY, 35 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY?
YOUNGSTOWN FDN GENERAL is the largest funder on record, with $1,096,797 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Rescue Mission of Mahoning Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 58 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing